首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Understanding the Impacts of Soil Climate and Farming Practices on Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration: A Simulation Study in Australia
【2h】

Understanding the Impacts of Soil Climate and Farming Practices on Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration: A Simulation Study in Australia

机译:了解土壤气候和耕作方式对土壤有机碳固存的影响:澳大利亚的模拟研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils has the capacity to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, as well as to improve soil biological, physical, and chemical properties. The review of literature pertaining to soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics within Australian grain farming systems does not enable us to conclude on the best farming practices to increase or maintain SOC for a specific combination of soil and climate. This study aimed to further explore the complex interactions of soil, climate, and farming practices on SOC. We undertook a modeling study with the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator modeling framework, by combining contrasting Australian soils, climates, and farming practices (crop rotations, and management within rotations, such as fertilization, tillage, and residue management) in a factorial design. This design resulted in the transposition of contrasting soils and climates in our simulations, giving soil–climate combinations that do not occur in the study area to help provide insights into the importance of the climate constraints on SOC. We statistically analyzed the model’s outputs to determinate the relative contributions of soil parameters, climate, and farming practices on SOC. The initial SOC content had the largest impact on the value of SOC, followed by the climate and the fertilization practices. These factors explained 66, 18, and 15% of SOC variations, respectively, after 80 years of constant farming practices in the simulation. Tillage and stubble management had the lowest impacts on SOC. This study highlighted the possible negative impact on SOC of a chickpea phase in a wheat–chickpea rotation and the potential positive impact of a cover crop in a sub-tropical climate (QLD, Australia) on SOC. It also showed the complexities in managing to achieve increased SOC, while simultaneously aiming to minimize nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and nitrate leaching in farming systems. The transposition of contrasting soils and climates in our simulations revealed the importance of the climate constraints on SOC.
机译:农业土壤中的碳固存具有减轻温室气体排放以及改善土壤生物学,物理和化学特性的能力。对有关澳大利亚谷物耕作系统中土壤有机碳(SOC)动态的文献的综述无法使我们得出关于增加或维持土壤和气候特定组合的SOC的最佳耕作方法的结论。这项研究旨在进一步探讨土壤,气候和耕作方式在SOC上的复杂相互作用。我们通过在因素设计中结合了澳大利亚对比的土壤,气候和耕作方式(作物轮作以及轮作内的管理,例如施肥,耕作和残渣管理),使用农业生产系统sIMulator建模框架进行了建模研究。该设计在我们的模拟中转换了对比土壤和气候的结果,从而给出了研究区域中未出现的土壤-气候组合,从而有助于洞悉气候约束对SOC的重要性。我们对模型的输出进行了统计分析,以确定土壤参数,气候和耕作方式对SOC的相对贡献。初始SOC含量对SOC的价值影响最大,其次是气候和施肥方式。经过80年的持续耕作实践,这些因素分别解释了SOC变化的66%,18%和15%。耕作和残茬管理对SOC的影响最小。这项研究强调了小麦-鹰嘴豆轮作过程中鹰嘴豆阶段对SOC的可能负面影响,以及在亚热带气候(澳大利亚昆士兰州)中的覆盖作物对SOC的潜在正面影响。它还显示了在实现增加SOC的同时进行管理的复杂性,同时旨在最大限度地减少农业系统中的一氧化二氮(N2O)排放和硝酸盐浸出。在我们的模拟中,对比土壤和气候的变化揭示了气候约束对SOC的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号