首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Accuracy Precision Ease-Of-Use and Cost of Methods to Test Ebola-Relevant Chlorine Solutions
【2h】

Accuracy Precision Ease-Of-Use and Cost of Methods to Test Ebola-Relevant Chlorine Solutions

机译:测试与埃博拉相关的氯溶液的方法的准确性准确性易用性和成本

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To prevent transmission in Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks, it is recommended to disinfect living things (hands and people) with 0.05% chlorine solution and non-living things (surfaces, personal protective equipment, dead bodies) with 0.5% chlorine solution. In the current West African EVD outbreak, these solutions (manufactured from calcium hypochlorite (HTH), sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)) have been widely used in both Ebola Treatment Unit and community settings. To ensure solution quality, testing is necessary, however test method appropriateness for these Ebola-relevant concentrations has not previously been evaluated. We identified fourteen commercially-available methods to test Ebola-relevant chlorine solution concentrations, including two titration methods, four DPD dilution methods, and six test strips. We assessed these methods by: 1) determining accuracy and precision by measuring in quintuplicate five different 0.05% and 0.5% chlorine solutions manufactured from NaDCC, HTH, and NaOCl; 2) conducting volunteer testing to assess ease-of-use; and, 3) determining costs. Accuracy was greatest in titration methods (reference-12.4% error compared to reference method), then DPD dilution methods (2.4–19% error), then test strips (5.2–48% error); precision followed this same trend. Two methods had an accuracy of <10% error across all five chlorine solutions with good precision: Hach digital titration for 0.05% and 0.5% solutions (recommended for contexts with trained personnel and financial resources), and Serim test strips for 0.05% solutions (recommended for contexts where rapid, inexpensive, and low-training burden testing is needed). Measurement error from test methods not including pH adjustment varied significantly across the five chlorine solutions, which had pH values 5–11. Volunteers found test strip easiest and titration hardest; costs per 100 tests were $14–37 for test strips and $33–609 for titration. Given the ease-of-use and cost benefits of test strips, we recommend further development of test strips robust to pH variation and appropriate for Ebola-relevant chlorine solution concentrations.
机译:为防止在埃博拉病毒病(EVD)爆发中传播,建议使用0.05%的氯溶液对生物(手和人)进行消毒,并使用0.5%的氯溶液对非生物(表面,个人防护设备,尸体)进行消毒。在当前的西非EVD暴发中,这些解决方案(由次氯酸钙(HTH),二氯异氰尿酸钠(NaDCC)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)制造)已在埃博拉病毒治疗单位和社区环境中广泛使用。为了确保溶液质量,必须进行测试,但是先前尚未评估过这些埃博拉相关浓度测试方法的适用性。我们确定了十四种可商购的方法来测试与埃博拉相关的氯溶液浓度,包括两种滴定方法,四种DPD稀释方法和六个测试条。我们通过以下方法评估了这些方法:1)通过一式五份测量由NaDCC,HTH和NaOCl制造的五种不同的0.05%和0.5%氯溶液来确定准确性和精密度; 2)进行志愿者测试以评估易用性; 3)确定成本。滴定方法的准确性最高(与参考方法相比,参考误差为12.4%),然后是DPD稀释方法(误差为2.4–19%),然后是试纸(误差为5.2–48%)。精度也遵循同样的趋势。两种方法在所有五种氯溶液中的准确度均<10%,且精度很高:哈希数字滴定法用于0.05%和0.5%的溶液(推荐用于受过培训的人员和财务资源的情况下),以及用于0.05%溶液的Serim试纸(建议用于需要快速,廉价和低培训负担测试的环境中。在pH值为5-11的五种氯溶液中,测试方法的测量误差(不包括pH调节)差异很大。志愿者发现试纸最容易,滴定最困难。每100条测试的费用是试纸14-37美元,滴定费用33-609美元。鉴于试纸条的易用性和成本优势,我们建议进一步开发对pH值稳定且适用于埃博拉相关氯溶液浓度的试纸条。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号