首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples
【2h】

Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples

机译:X射线显微断层照相术和同一样品的界面分区示踪剂测试所测量的流体界面面积的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two different methods are currently used for measuring interfacial areas between immiscible fluids within 3-D porous media, high-resolution microtomographic imaging and interfacial partitioning tracer tests (IPTT). Both methods were used in this study to measure non-wetting/wetting interfacial areas for a natural sand. The microtomographic imaging was conducted on the same packed columns that were used for the IPTTs. This is in contrast to prior studies comparing the two methods, for which in all cases different samples were used for the two methods. In addition, the columns were imaged before and after the IPTTs to evaluate the potential impacts of the tracer solution on fluid configuration and attendant interfacial area. The interfacial areas measured using IPTT are ~5 times larger than the microtomographic-measured values, which is consistent with previous work. Analysis of the image data revealed no significant impact of the tracer solution on NAPL configuration or interfacial area. Other potential sources of error were evaluated, and all were demonstrated to be insignificant. The disparity in measured interfacial areas between the two methods is attributed to the limitation of the microtomography method to characterize interfacial area associated with microscopic surface roughness due to resolution constraints.
机译:当前使用两种不同的方法来测量3-D多孔介质中不混溶流体之间的界面区域,高分辨率显微断层成像和界面分配示踪剂测试(IPTT)。在这项研究中,两种方法都用于测量天然沙子的非润湿/润湿界面区域。显微层析成像是在与IPTT相同的填充柱上进行的。这与之前比较这两种方法的研究形成对比,之前的研究在所有情况下都将不同的样本用于这两种方法。此外,在IPTT之前和之后对色谱柱进行成像,以评估示踪剂溶液对流体构造和伴随界面面积的潜在影响。使用IPTT测量的界面面积大约是显微断层扫描测量值的5倍,这与以前的工作是一致的。对图像数据的分析表明,示踪剂解决方案对NAPL配置或界面面积没有重大影响。对其他潜在的错误来源进行了评估,并证明所有这些来源均无关紧要。两种方法之间测量的界面区域的差异归因于显微断层扫描方法的局限性,因为该方法无法表征由于分辨率限制而与微观表面粗糙度相关的界面区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号