首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Modelling Random Coincidences in Positron Emission Tomography by Using Singles and Prompts: A Comparison Study
【2h】

Modelling Random Coincidences in Positron Emission Tomography by Using Singles and Prompts: A Comparison Study

机译:正电子发射层析成像中随机重合的单点和提示建模:一个比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Random coincidences degrade the image in Positron Emission Tomography, PET. To compensate for their degradation effects, the rate of random coincidences should be estimated. Under certain circumstances, current estimation methods fail to provide accurate results. We propose a novel method, “Singles–Prompts” (SP), that includes the information conveyed by prompt coincidences and models the pile–up. The SP method has the same structure than the well-known “Singles Rate” (SR) approach. Hence, SP can straightforwardly replace SR. In this work, the SP method has been extensively assessed and compared to two conventional methods, SR and the delayed window (DW) method, in a preclinical PET scenario using Monte–Carlo simulations. SP offers accurate estimates for the randoms rates, while SR and DW tend to overestimate the rates (∼10%, and 5%, respectively). With pile-up, the SP method is more robust than SR (but less than DW). At the image level, the contrast is overestimated in SR-corrected images, +16%, while SP produces the correct value. Spill–over is slightly reduced using SP instead of SR. The DW images values are similar to those of SP except for low-statistic scenarios, where DW behaves as if randoms were not compensated for. In particular, the contrast is reduced, −16%. In general, the better estimations of SP translate into better image quality.
机译:随机巧合会降低正电子发射断层扫描(PET)中的图像。为了补偿其降级效果,应估计随机符合率。在某些情况下,当前的估算方法无法提供准确的结果。我们提出了一种新颖的方法“单提示”(SP),该方法包括通过即时巧合传达的信息并对堆积进行建模。 SP方法与众所周知的“单率”(SR)方法具有相同的结构。因此,SP可以直接替代SR。在这项工作中,对SP方法进行了广泛的评估,并在临床前PET场景中使用Monte-Carlo模拟将其与SR和延迟窗口(DW)两种常规方法进行了比较。 SP提供了对随机率的准确估计,而SR和DW倾向于高估了随机率(分别约为10%和5%)。通过堆积,SP方法比SR健壮(但小于DW)。在图像级别,在SR校正的图像中对比度被高估了+ 16%,而SP会产生正确的值。使用SP而不是SR可以稍微减少溢出。 DW图像值与SP的图像值相似,但低统计情况除外,在这种情况下DW的行为就像没有对随机数进行补偿。尤其是,对比度降低了-16%。通常,对SP的更好估计会转化为更好的图像质量。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Josep F. Oliver; M. Rafecas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(11),9
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0162096
  • 总页数 22
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号