首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles
【2h】

A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles

机译:贝叶斯剂量寻找设计结合了多个治疗周期的毒性数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Phase I oncology trials are designed to identify a safe dose with an acceptable toxicity profile. The dose is typically determined based on the probability of severe toxicity observed during the first treatment cycle, although patients continue to receive treatment for multiple cycles. In addition, the toxicity data from multiple types and grades are typically summarized into a single binary outcome of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). A novel endpoint, the total toxicity profile (TTP), was previously developed to account for the multiple toxicity types and grades. In this work, we propose to account for longitudinal repeated measures of TTP over multiple treatment cycles, accounting for cumulative toxicity during dosing-finding. A linear mixed model was utilized in the Bayesian framework, with addition of Bayesian risk functions for decision-making in dose assignment. The performance of this design is evaluated using simulation studies and compared with the previously proposed Quasi-Likelihood CRM (QLCRM) design. Twelve clinical scenarios incorporating four different locations of MTD and three different time trends (decreasing, increasing, and no effect) were investigated. The proposed repeated measures design (RMD) was comparable to the QLCRM when only cycle one data was utilized in dose-finding; however it demonstrated an improvement over the QLCRM when data from multiple cycles were used across all scenarios.
机译:I期肿瘤试验旨在确定具有可接受毒性特征的安全剂量。尽管患者在多个疗程中继续接受治疗,但通常根据在第一个疗程中观察到的严重毒性的可能性来确定剂量。另外,通常将来自多种类型和等级的毒性数据汇总为剂量限制毒性(DLT)的单个二进制结果。先前已经开发出一种新的终点,即总毒性概况(TTP),以说明多种毒性类型和等级。在这项工作中,我们建议考虑多个治疗周期内TTP的纵向重复测量,并考虑剂量查找期间的累积毒性。在贝叶斯框架中使用了线性混合模型,并添加了贝叶斯风险函数以进行剂量分配决策。使用仿真研究评估了该设计的性能,并将其与先前提出的拟似然CRM(QLCRM)设计进行了比较。研究了十二种临床情况,其中包括了四个不同的MTD位置和三个不同的时间趋势(减小,增加和没有影响)。当仅使用第一个周期的数据进行剂量查找时,建议的重复测量设计(RMD)与QLCRM相当。但是,当在所有方案中使用多个周期的数据时,它证明了QLCRM的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号