首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation
【2h】

Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation

机译:腰椎间盘突出症慢性疼痛患者经皮硬膜外黏膜溶解治疗不同different骨的疗效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain, comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types in chronic pain with lumbosacral herniated intervertebral disc (L-HIVD).A total of 1158 chronic low back and/or leg pain patients who diagnosed with L-HIVD and underwent PEA between February 2011 and March 2015 were retrospectively examined. All enrolled patients were divided into 2 types: dome-sacral type and flat type. To avoid confounding bias, propensity score analysis was used. Numeric rating scales (NRS) and Patients’ Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were compared between the 2 types at baseline and at 3 months post-PEA.After conducting a propensity score matching analysis, 114 patients were included in each type. The mean sacral angle significantly differed between the flat-sacral and dome-sacral types (P < 0.001). A linear mixed effect model analysis showed that the adjusted NRS score at baseline was 7.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.40–7.76] for the flat-sacral type and 7.47 (95% CI: 7.29–7.64) for the dome-sacral type. The adjusted NRS score after 3 months post-PEA was 4.27 (95% CI: 3.77–4.77) for the flat-sacral type and 3.71 (95% CI: 3.21–4.21) for the dome-sacral type. We detected no significant differences in NRS at baseline (P = 0.371) and after 3 months (P = 0.121) between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of the NRS score between the 2 groups during the 3 months follow-up (omnibus P = 0.223). There were no significant differences in PGIC between flat-sacral and dome-sacral types at 3 months after the follow-up period (4.40 ± 2.17 and 4.67 ± 1.88, respectively, P = 0.431).PEA provides sufficient pain relief for chronic pain due to L-HIVD at 3 months postprocedure. The sacral type might not affect the outcome of lumbar PEA in chronic pain associated lumbar HIVD.
机译:对于慢性腰背和/或腿部疼痛患者的经皮硬膜外黏附溶解术(PEA),尚未研究comparative骨类型之间腰部PEA的比较疗效。这项研究旨在确定腰PE PEA在腰ac部椎间盘突出症(L-HIVD)慢性疼痛中的比较功效。总共1158例经诊断为L-HIVD并接受L-HIVD的慢性腰背和/或腿部慢性疼痛患者回顾性分析了2011年2月至2015年3月的PEA。所有入选患者分为两种类型:穹-型和扁平型。为了避免混淆偏差,使用了倾向得分分析。在基线和PEA后3个月时比较了这两种类型的数字评分量表(NRS)和患者的总体变化印象(PGIC)。在进行了倾向得分匹配分析后,每种类型包括114名患者。扁平-骨和圆顶-骨类型之间的平均骨角有显着差异(P <0.001)。线性混合效应模型分析显示,扁平-骨型在基线时调整后的NRS评分为7.58 [95%置信区间(CI):7.40-7.76],而穹me型则为7.47(95%CI:7.29-7.64)。骨类型。 PEA后3个月,扁平flat骨型的调整后NRS评分为4.27(95%CI:3.77–4.77),圆顶do骨型为3.71(95%CI:3.21–4.21)。我们在两组之间在基线时(P = 0.371)和三个月后(P = 0.121)均未发现NRS有显着差异。在3个月的随访中,两组之间的NRS评分均无显着差异(综合P = 0.223)。随访3个月后,扁平-骨和穹-骨类型的PGIC无显着差异(分别为4.40±2.17和4.67±1.88,P = 0.431)。PEA可有效缓解慢性疼痛术后3个月服用L-HIVD。在慢性疼痛相关的腰部HIVD中,骨类型可能不会影响腰部PEA的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号