首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparative pharmacodynamics of four different carbapenems in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
【2h】

Comparative pharmacodynamics of four different carbapenems in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

机译:四种不同碳青霉烯类与多粘菌素B组合对耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌的比较药效学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine the comparative pharmacodynamics of four different carbapenems in combination with polymyxin B (PMB) against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates using time–kill experiments at two different inocula. Two A. baumannii strains (03-149-1 and N16870) with carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 8 to 64 mg/L were investigated in 48-h time–kill experiments using starting inocula of 106 CFU/mL and 108 CFU/mL. Concentration arrays of ertapenem, doripenem, meropenem and imipenem at 0.25×, 0.5×, 1×, 1.5× and 2× published maximum serum concentration (Cmax) values (Cmax concentrations of 12, 21, 48 and 60 mg/L, respectively) were investigated in the presence of 1.5 mg/L PMB. Use of carbapenems without PMB resulted in drastic re-growth. All carbapenem combinations were able to achieve a ≥3 log10 CFU/mL reduction by 4 h against both strains at 106 CFU/mL, whereas maximum reductions against strain 03-149-1 at 108 CFU/mL were 1.0, 3.2, 2.2 and 3.3 log10 CFU/mL for ertapenem, doripenem, meropenem and imipenem, respectively. None of the combinations were capable of reducing 108 CFU/mL of N16870 by ≥2 log10 CFU/mL. Ertapenem combinations consistently displayed the least activity, whereas doripenem, meropenem and imipenem combinations had similar activities that were poorly predicted by carbapenem MICs. As doripenem, meropenem, or imipenem displayed similar pharmacodyanmics in combination, the decision of which carbapenem to use in combination with PMB may be based on toxicodynamic profiles if drastic discordance in MICs is not present.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过在两个不同接种点进行时间杀灭实验,确定四种不同碳青霉烯类与多粘菌素B(PMB)联合使用对耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌的分离株的比较药效。在48 h的时间杀灭实验中,使用10 6 <的开始接种,研究了两种碳青霉烯最低抑菌浓度(MICs)为8-64 mg / L的鲍曼不动杆菌菌株(03-149-1和N16870)。 / sup> CFU / mL和10 8 CFU / mL。厄他培南,多利培南,美罗培南和亚胺培南的浓度阵列分别以0.25x,0.5x,1x,1.5x和2x的浓度公布了最大血清浓度(Cmax)值(Cmax浓度分别为12、21、48和60 mg / L)在1.5 mg / L PMB存在下进行了研究。不使用PMB的碳青霉烯类药物可导致生长迅速。所有碳青霉烯类组合在4 h时对两种菌株在10 6 CFU / mL下均能实现≥3log10 CFU / mL降低,而在10 下对03-149-1菌株的最大降低量厄他培南,多利培南,美罗培南和亚胺培南的8 Cup / mL分别为1.0、3.2、2.2和3.3 log10 CFU / mL。这些组合均不能将N16870的10 8 CFU / mL降低≥2log10 CFU / mL。厄他培南组合始终显示出最低的活性,而多瑞培南,美罗培南和亚胺培南的组合具有相似的活性,而碳青霉烯的MICs对此预测较差。由于多立培南,美罗培南或亚胺培南联合使用时显示出相似的药效学,因此,如果在MICs中不存在明显的矛盾,则决定将哪种碳青霉烯与PMB联合使用可能取决于毒物动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号