首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisements Can Paradoxically Increase Intentions to Adopt Lifestyle Changes
【2h】

Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisements Can Paradoxically Increase Intentions to Adopt Lifestyle Changes

机译:直接面向消费者的药品广告可能反而增加了采用生活方式改变的意图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertisements are thought to induce “boomerang effects,” meaning they reduce the perceived effectiveness of a potential alternative option: non-pharmaceutical treatment via lifestyle change. Past research has observed such effects using artificially created, text-only advertisements that may not adequate capture the complex, conflicting portrayal of lifestyle change in real television advertisements. In other risk domains, individual “problem status” often moderates boomerang effects, such that subjects who currently engage in the risky behavior exhibit the strongest boomerang effects.>Objectives: We aimed to assess whether priming with real DTC television advertisements elicited boomerang effects on perceptions of lifestyle change and whether these effects, if present, were moderated by individual problem status.>Methods: We assembled a sample of real, previously aired DTC television advertisements in order to naturalistically capture the portrayal of lifestyle change in real advertisements. We randomized 819 adults in the United States recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk to view or not view an advertisement for a prescription drug. We further randomized subjects to judge either lifestyle change or drugs on three measures: general effectiveness, disease severity for a hypothetical patient, and personal intention to use the intervention if diagnosed with the target health condition.>Results: Advertisement exposure induced a statistically significant, but weak, boomerang effect on general effectiveness (p = 0.01, partial R2 = 0.007) and did not affect disease severity score (p = 0.32, partial R2 = 0.0009). Advertisement exposure elicited a reverse boomerang effect of similar effect size on personal intentions, such that advertisement-exposed subjects reported comparatively higher intentions to use lifestyle change relative to drugs (p = 0.006, partial R2 = 0.008). Individual problem status did not significantly moderate these effects.>Conclusion: In contrast to previous literature finding large boomerang effects using artificial advertisement stimuli, real television advertisements elicited only a weak boomerang effect on perceived effectiveness and elicited an unexpected reverse boomerang effect on personal intentions to use lifestyle change versus drugs. These findings may reflect real advertisements’ induction of descriptive norms and self-efficacy; future research could address such possibilities by systematically manipulating advertisement content.
机译:>背景:直接面向消费者(DTC)处方药的广告被认为会引起“回旋镖效应”,这意味着它们会降低潜在的替代选择的效果:通过改变生活方式进行非药物治疗。过去的研究已经使用人工创建的纯文本广告观察到了这种效果,这些广告可能不足以捕捉真实电视广告中生活方式变化的复杂,相互矛盾的刻画。在其他风险域中,个体的“问题状态”通常会减轻回旋镖的影响,从而使当前从事危险行为的受试者表现出最强的回旋镖效应。>目标:我们旨在评估是否使用真正的DTC电视启动广告引发了回旋镖对生活方式改变观念的影响,以及这些影响是否存在(如果存在的话)是否受到个人问题状况的影响。>方法:我们收集了之前播出的真实的DTC电视广告样本,以便自然地捕捉真实广告中生活方式改变的刻画。我们对通过Amazon Mechanical Turk招募的819名成人进行了随机分组,以查看或不查看处方药广告。我们进一步从三个方面对受试者进行随机分组,以判断生活方式的改变或药物的使用:总体有效性,假设患者的疾病严重程度以及如果被诊断出目标健康状况,则打算使用干预措施。>结果:暴露诱导的回旋镖对一般有效性具有统计学意义,但微弱的回旋镖效应(p = 0.01,部分R 2 = 0.007),并且不影响疾病严重程度评分(p = 0.32,部分R 2 = 0.0009)。广告曝光会引起反向回旋镖效果,其效果与个人意图类似,因此与广告接触的受试者报告的使用生活方式相对于药物的意图更高(p = 0.006,部分R 2 = 0.008) 。个体问题的状态并没有显着缓解这些影响。飞旋镖对使用生活方式的改变和吸毒的个人意图的影响。这些发现可能反映了真实广告对描述性规范和自我效能的诱导;未来的研究可以通过系统地处理广告内容来解决这种可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号