首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants residential environments
【2h】

The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants residential environments

机译:住房流动性实验对参与者居住环境的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how housing choice vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly-assigned MTO treatment groups (Low Poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, Control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4-7 years after baseline), by using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based datasets. Compared to controls, families in Low-Poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The Low-poverty voucher group moreover achieved better neighborhood attainment compared to Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York and Los Angeles. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.
机译:我们使用了“迁移到机会”(MTO)住房实验,以了解住房选择凭单和住房流动政策如何帮助生活在高贫困地区的家庭在广泛的邻里属性中向更高质量的邻里转移机会。我们使用调查报告,并结合住所历史,比较了三个随机分配的MTO治疗组(低贫困代金券,第8节代金券,对照组)在1997和2002年地点(基线后4-7年)的邻里获得情况。到许多不同的行政和基于人口的数据集。与对照组相比,低贫困和第8节组的家庭在邻里条件方面采取了多种措施,包括经济条件,社会制度(例如,集体效能),环境的物理特征(例如,树木覆盖)和健康状况等得到了显着改善。 。此外,与第8节相比,“低贫困代金券”群体的邻里获得更好的待遇。纽约和洛杉矶的治疗效果最大。我们讨论了研究结果对扩大经济适用房政策的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号