首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Better Minds Better Morals: A Procedural Guide to Better Judgment
【2h】

Better Minds Better Morals: A Procedural Guide to Better Judgment

机译:更好的思想更好的道德:更好的判断的程序指南

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Making more moral decisions – an uncontroversial goal, if ever there was one. But how to go about it? In this article, we offer a practical guide on ways to promote good judgment in our personal and professional lives. We will do this not by outlining what the good life consists in or which values we should accept.Rather, we offer a theory of procedural reliability: a set of dimensions of thought that are generally conducive to good moral reasoning. At the end of the day, we all have to decide for ourselves what is good and bad, right and wrong. The best way to ensure we make the right choices is to ensure the procedures we’re employing are sound and reliable.We identify four broad categories of judgment to be targeted – cognitive, self-management, motivational and interpersonal. Specific factors within each category are further delineated, with a total of 14 factors to be discussed. For each, we will go through the reasons it generally leads to more morally reliable decision-making, how various thinkers have historically addressed the topic, and the insights of recent research that can offer new ways to promote good reasoning. The result is a wide-ranging survey that contains practical advice on how to make better choices.Finally, we relate this to the project of transhumanism and prudential decision-making. We argue that transhumans will employ better moral procedures like these. We also argue that the same virtues will enable us to take better control of our own lives, enhancing our responsibility and enabling us to lead better lives from the prudential perspective.
机译:做出更多的道德决策–毫无争议的目标,如果有的话。但是如何去做呢?在本文中,我们提供了有关在个人和职业生活中促进良好判断力的实用指南。我们不会通过概述美好生活的内涵或应该接受的价值观来做到这一点,相反,我们提供了程序可靠性理论:通常有助于良好道德推理的一系列思维维度。归根结底,我们每个人都必须自己决定好与坏,对与错。确保我们做出正确选择的最好方法是确保我们采用的程序合理可靠。我们确定要针对的四大类判断:认知,自我管理,动机和人际关系。每个类别中的特定因素将进一步描述,共有14个因素需要讨论。对于每一个问题,我们将详细探讨通常导致更道德可靠的决策的原因,各种思想家在历史上如何处理该主题,以及最新研究的见识,这些见解可以提供促进良好推理的新方法。结果是范围广泛的调查,其中包含有关如何做出更好选择的实用建议。最后,我们将其与超人类主义和审慎决策项目联系起来。我们认为,超人类将采用更好的道德程序。我们还认为,同样的美德将使我们能够更好地控制自己的生活,增强我们的责任感,并使我们能够从审慎的角度过上更好的生活。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 26–43
  • 总页数 15
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号