首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
【2h】

Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?

机译:城市社区活动空间的社会经济隔离:共享居住意味着共享惯例吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ non-home activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households located in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.
机译:居民收入和教育程度的隔离现象正在加剧,而黑白隔离现象却在逐渐减少。尚未探索城市居民非家庭活动空间中的隔离。生活在同一社区中的人们的日常活动如何整合?相较于受过类似教育或收入的人,生活在彼此附近的社会经济背景不同的人分享日常活动地点的可能性更低吗?这些模式在整个社会经济连续性或邻里结构方面是否有所不同?这些分析利用了来自洛杉矶家庭和邻里调查的独特数据,该数据确定了居民从事日常活动的地点。使用多级p2(网络)模型,我们分析了位于同一邻域的成对住户,并检查了三级SES的二元组合是否在同一位置进行例行活动,以及在例行活动的共同地点中邻居社会经济是否相似取决于邻里社会经济不平等和信任的程度。结果表明,平均而言,SES的增加减少了与任何SES组共享活动位置的可能性。这种模式在以社会经济不平等程度高为特征的社区最为明显。邻里信任解释了不平等影响对SES进行日常活动分类的程度的重要意义。因此,SES的明显可见的邻里级不平等可能会导致不信任对跨班级共享例程的意愿产生更大的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号