首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Combined Social Phobia Scale and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale: Support for a Bifactor Model
【2h】

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Combined Social Phobia Scale and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale: Support for a Bifactor Model

机译:社交恐惧症量表和社交互动焦虑量表组合的验证性因素分析:双因素模型的支持

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) together, this study examined support for a bifactor model, and also the internal consistency reliability and external validity of the factors in this model. Participants (N = 526) were adults from the general community who completed the SPS and SIAS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of their ratings indicated good support for the bifactor model. For this model, the loadings for all but six items were higher on the general factor than the specific factors. The three positively worded items had negligible loadings on the general factor. The general factor explained most of the common variance in the SPS and SIAS, and demonstrated good model-based internal consistency reliability (omega hierarchical) and a strong association with fear of negative evaluation and extraversion. The practical implications of the findings for the utilization of the SPS and SIAS, and the theoretical and clinical implications for social anxiety are discussed.
机译:对于社交恐惧症量表(SPS)和社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS),本研究检验了对双因素模型的支持,以及该模型中因素的内部一致性可靠性和外部有效性。参与者(N = 526)是来自社区的成年人,他们完成了SPS和SIAS。其等级的验证性因子分析(CFA)表明对双因子模型有很好的支持。对于此模型,除了六项外,所有其他因素的载荷在一般因素上均高于特定因素。三个积极措词的项目对一般因素的影响可以忽略不计。通用因素解释了SPS和SIAS中的大多数常见差异,并表现出良好的基于​​模型的内部一致性可靠性(Ω等级),并且与担心负面评估和外向性密切相关。讨论了研究结果对SPS和SIAS的利用的实际意义,以及对社交焦虑的理论和临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号