首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A systematic evaluation of methods for tailoring genome-scale metabolic models
【2h】

A systematic evaluation of methods for tailoring genome-scale metabolic models

机译:评估基因组规模代谢模型的方法的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Genome-scale models of metabolism can illuminate the molecular basis of cell phenotypes. Since many enzymes are only active in specific cell types, several algorithms use omics data to construct cell line- and tissue-specific metabolic models from genome-scale models. However, these methods have not been rigorously benchmarked, and it is unclear how algorithm and parameter selection (e.g., gene expression thresholds, metabolic constraints) impacts model content and predictive accuracy. To investigate this, we built hundreds of models of four different cancer cell lines using six algorithms, four gene expression thresholds and three sets of metabolic constraints. Model content varied substantially across different parameter sets, but model extraction method choice had the largest impact on the accuracy of model-predicted gene essentiality. We further highlight how assumptions during model development influence the accuracy of model prediction. These insights will guide further development of context-specific models, thus more accurately resolving genotype-phenotype relationships.
机译:代谢的基因组规模模型可以阐明细胞表型的分子基础。由于许多酶仅在特定细胞类型中具有活性,因此多种算法使用组学数据从基因组规模模型构建细胞系和组织特异性代谢模型。但是,这些方法尚未经过严格的基准测试,目前尚不清楚算法和参数选择(例如,基因表达阈值,代谢限制)如何影响模型内容和预测准确性。为了对此进行研究,我们使用六个算法,四个基因表达阈值和三组代谢限制条件建立了四种不同癌细胞系的数百个模型。不同参数集之间的模型内容差异很大,但是模型提取方法的选择对模型预测的基因本质的准确性影响最大。我们进一步强调模型开发过程中的假设如何影响模型预测的准确性。这些见解将指导特定于上下文的模型的进一步开发,从而更准确地解决基因型与表型的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号