首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A microRNA signature in circulating exosomes is superior to exosomal glypican-1 levels for diagnosing pancreatic cancer
【2h】

A microRNA signature in circulating exosomes is superior to exosomal glypican-1 levels for diagnosing pancreatic cancer

机译:在诊断胰腺癌中循环外泌体中的microRNA信号优于外泌体glypican-1水平

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly malignancy that often presents clinically at an advanced stage and that may be confused with chronic pancreatitis (CP). Conversely, CP may be misdiagnosed as PDAC leading to unwarranted pancreas resection. Therefore, early PDAC diagnosis and clear differentiation between PDAC and CP are crucial for improved care. Exosomes are circulating micro-vesicles whose components can serve as cancer biomarkers. We compared exosomal glypican-1 (GPC1) and microRNA levels in normal control subjects and in patients with PDAC and CP. We report that exosomal GPC1 is not diagnostic for PDAC, whereas high exosomal levels of microRNA-10b, (miR-10b), miR-21, miR-30c, and miR-181a and low miR-let7a readily differentiate PDAC from normal control and CP samples. By contrast with GPC1, elevated exosomal miR levels decreased to normal values within 24 h following PDAC resection. All 29 PDAC cases exhibited significantly elevated exosomal miR-10b and miR-30c levels, whereas 8 cases had normal or slightly increased CA 19-9 levels. Thus, our exosomal miR signature is superior to exosomal GPC1 or plasma CA 19-9 levels in establishing a diagnosis of PDAC and differentiating between PDAC and CP.
机译:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种致命的恶性肿瘤,通常在临床上呈晚期出现,可能与慢性胰腺炎(CP)混淆。相反,CP可能被误诊为PDAC,导致胰腺切除不当。因此,早期PDAC诊断以及PDAC和CP之间的清晰区分对于改善护理至关重要。外泌体是循环的微囊泡,其成分可以用作癌症生物标志物。我们比较了正常对照组和PDAC和CP患者的外泌体Glypican-1(GPC1)和microRNA水平。我们报道外泌体GPC1不能诊断PDAC,而高外泌体水平的microRNA-10b,(miR-10b),miR-21,miR-30c和miR-181a和低miR-let7a可以轻易地将PDAC与正常对照区分开来。 CP样本。与GPC1相反,PDAC切除后24小时内,外泌体miR水平升高降至正常值。所有29例PDAC病例的外泌体miR-10b和miR-30c水平均显着升高,而8例CA 19-9水平正常或略有升高。因此,在建立PDAC的诊断和区分PDAC和CP方面,我们的外泌体miR信号优于外泌体GPC1或血浆CA 19-9水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号