首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
【2h】

Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect

机译:处理分散注意力的非面部情感图像:没有证据表明与年龄有关的正性效应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cognitive aging may be accompanied by increased prioritization of social and emotional goals that enhance positive experiences and emotional states. The socioemotional selectivity theory suggests this may be achieved by giving preference to positive information and avoiding or suppressing negative information. Although there is some evidence of a positivity bias in controlled attention tasks, it remains unclear whether a positivity bias extends to the processing of affective stimuli presented outside focused attention. In two experiments, we investigated age-related differences in the effects of to-be-ignored non-face affective images on target processing. In Experiment 1, 27 older (64–90 years) and 25 young adults (19–29 years) made speeded valence judgments about centrally presented positive or negative target images taken from the International Affective Picture System. To-be-ignored distractor images were presented above and below the target image and were either positive, negative, or neutral in valence. The distractors were considered task relevant because they shared emotional characteristics with the target stimuli. Both older and young adults responded slower to targets when distractor valence was incongruent with target valence relative to when distractors were neutral. Older adults responded faster to positive than to negative targets but did not show increased interference effects from positive distractors. In Experiment 2, affective distractors were task irrelevant as the target was a three-digit array and did not share emotional characteristics with the distractors. Twenty-six older (63–84 years) and 30 young adults (18–30 years) gave speeded responses on a digit disparity task while ignoring the affective distractors positioned in the periphery. Task performance in either age group was not influenced by the task-irrelevant affective images. In keeping with the socioemotional selectivity theory, these findings suggest that older adults preferentially process task-relevant positive non-face images but only when presented within the main focus of attention.
机译:认知衰老可能伴随着社会和情感目标优先次序的增加,从而增强了积极的体验和情感状态。社会情感选择性理论表明,这可以通过偏向积极信息并避免或压制消极信息来实现。尽管有证据表明在受控注意力任务中存在积极性偏见,但尚不清楚积极性偏见是否扩展到了注意力以外的情绪刺激的处理。在两个实验中,我们研究了与年龄有关的差异,这些差异在目标处理中被忽略的非面部情感图像的影响。在实验1中,有27位年龄较大(64-90岁)和25位年轻人(19-29岁)对从国际情感图片系统拍摄的集中呈现的正或负目标图像做出了快速的化合价判断。在目标图像的上方和下方显示了将被忽略的干扰物图像,其价态为正,负或中性。分散注意力者被认为与任务相关,因为它们与目标刺激物共享情感特征。相对于中性干扰物,当干扰物价与目标价不一致时,老年人和年轻人对目标的反应都较慢。老年人对阳性靶标的反应比对阴性靶标的反应更快,但对阳性干扰物的干扰作用并未增强。在实验2中,情感干扰物与任务无关,因为目标是一个三位数的数组,并且与干扰物没有情感特征。二十六岁(63-84岁)和30个年轻人(18-30岁)对数字视差任务的反应迅速,而忽略了周围的情感干扰物。在任何年龄组中,任务表现都不受与任务无关的情感图像的影响。与社会情感选择性理论相一致,这些发现表明,老年人优先处理与任务相关的正面非脸部图像,但仅在关注的主要焦点内呈现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号