首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Type of Forage Substrate Preparation Included as Substrate in a RUSITEC System Affects the Ruminal Microbiota and Fermentation Characteristics
【2h】

The Type of Forage Substrate Preparation Included as Substrate in a RUSITEC System Affects the Ruminal Microbiota and Fermentation Characteristics

机译:RUSITEC系统中包含的底物的饲草底物制备类型会影响瘤胃微生物群和发酵特性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In vitro fermentation systems such as the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) are frequently used to assess dietary manipulations in livestock, thereby limiting the use of live animals. Despite being in use for nearly 40 years, improvements are continually sought in these systems to better reflect and mimic natural processes in ruminants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of forage preparation, i.e., frozen minced (FM) and freeze-dried and ground (FDG), on the ruminal microbiota and on fermentation characteristics when included as a substrate in a RUSITEC system. A completely randomized design experiment was performed over a 15-day period, with 7 days of adaptation and an 8-day experimental period. Fermentation parameters (total gas, CH4, and volatile fatty acid production) were analyzed on a daily basis over the experimental period and the archaeal and bacterial microbiota (liquid-associated microbes [LAM] and solid-associated microbes [SAM] was assessed at 0, 5, 10, and 15 days using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Results from this study suggested a tendency (P = 0.09) of FM treatment to increase daily CH4 (mg/d) production by 16.7% when compared with FDG treatment. Of the major volatile fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate), only butyrate production was greater (P = 0.01) with FM treatment compared with FDG substrate. The archaeal and bacterial diversity and richness did not differ between the forage preparations, although feed particle size of the forage had a significant effect on microbial community structure in the SAM and LAM samples. The Bacteroidetes phylum was more relatively abundant in the FM substrate treatment, while Proteobacteria was enriched in the FDG treatment. At the genus-level, Butyrivibrio, Prevotella, and Roseburia were enriched in the FM substrate treatment and Campylobacter and Lactobacillus in the FDG substrate treatment. Evidence from this study suggests that forage preparation affects CH4 production, butyrate production, and the structure of the rumen microbiota during in vitro fermentation.
机译:经常使用诸如瘤胃模拟技术(RUSITEC)的体外发酵系统来评估牲畜的饮食操作,从而限制了活体动物的使用。尽管已经使用了近40年,但仍在不断寻求改进这些系统,以更好地反映和模仿反刍动物的自然过程。这项研究的目的是评估作为RUSITEC系统底物的饲料制备方法,即冷冻切碎(FM)和冷冻干燥并磨碎(FDG)对瘤胃微生物群和发酵特性的影响。在15天的时间内进行了完全随机的设计实验,其中有7天的适应时间和8天的实验时间。在实验期间每天分析发酵参数(总气体,CH4和挥发性脂肪酸的产生),并将古细菌和细菌菌群(液体相关微生物[LAM]和固体相关微生物[SAM])评估为0 ,第5、10和15天使用16S rRNA基因的高通量测序,这项研究的结果表明FM处理的趋势(P = 0.09)与每日CH4(mg / d)产量相比增加了16.7%。 FDG处理:在主要挥发性脂肪酸(乙酸,丙酸和丁酸)中,FM处理与FDG底物相比,丁酸的产量更高(P = 0.01),草料的古细菌和细菌多样性以及丰富度没有差异。尽管饲料的粒度对SAM和LAM样品中的微生物群落结构有显着影响,但在FM底物处理中,门生细菌更丰富,而变形杆菌为富含FDG处理。在属水平上,Butyrivibrio,Prevotella和Roseburia在FM底物处理中富集,弯曲杆菌和乳杆菌在FDG底物处理中富集。这项研究的证据表明,在体外发酵过程中,饲草的制备会影响CH4的产生,丁酸的产生以及瘤胃微生物的结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号