首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of hirst-type spore trap to monitor environmental fungal load in hospital
【2h】

Evaluation of hirst-type spore trap to monitor environmental fungal load in hospital

机译:评价用于监测医院环境真菌负荷的生灭型孢子阱

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The main purpose was to validate the use of outdoor-indoor volumetric impaction sampler with Hirst-type spore traps (HTSTs) to continuously monitor fungal load in order to prevent invasive fungal infections during major structural work in hospital settings. For 4 weeks, outdoor fungal loads were quantified continuously by 3 HTSTs. Indoor air was sampled by both HTST and viable impaction sampler. Results were expressed as particles/m3 (HTST) or colony-forming units (CFU)/m3 (biocollector). Paired comparisons by day were made with Wilcoxon’s paired signed-rank test or paired Student’s t-test as appropriate. Paired airborne spore levels were correlated 2 by 2, after log-transformation with Pearson’s cross-correlation. Concordance was calculated with kappa coefficient (κ). Median total fungal loads (TFLs) sampled by the 3 outdoor HTSTs were 3,025.0, 3,287.5 and 3,625.0 particles/m3 (P = 0.6, 0.6 and 0.3).—Concordance between Aspergillaceae fungal loads (AFLs, including Aspergillus spp. + Penicillium spp.) was low (κ = 0.2). A low positive correlation was found between TFLs sampled with outdoor HTST and indoor HTST with applying a 4-hour time lag, r = 0.30, 95% CI (0.23–0.43), P<0.001. In indoor air, Aspergillus spp. were detected by the viable impaction sampler on 63.1% of the samples, whereas AFLs were found by HTST-I on only 3.6% of the samples. Concordance between Aspergillus spp. loads and AFLs sampled with the 2 methods was very low (κ = 0.1). This study showed a 4-hour time lag between increase of outdoor and indoor TFLs, possibly due to insulation and aeraulic flow of the building. Outdoor HTSTs may permit to quickly identify (after 48 hours) time periods with high outdoor fungal loads. An identified drawback is that a too low sample area read did not seem to enable detection of Aspergillaceae spores efficiently. Indoor HTSTs may not be recommended at this time, and outdoor HTSTs need further study. Air sampling by viable impaction sampler remains the reference tool for quantifying fungal contamination of indoor air in hospitals.
机译:主要目的是验证带有Hirst型孢子捕集器(HTST)的室外室内容积式冲击采样器的使用,以连续监测真菌负荷,以防止医院环境中主要结构性工作期间的侵入性真菌感染。在4周内,通过3个HTST连续定量了室外真菌的负荷。室内空气通过HTST和可行的撞击采样器采样。结果表示为颗粒/ m 3 (HTST)或菌落形成单位(CFU)/ m 3 (生物收集器)。每天使用威尔科克森的配对符号秩检验或配对的学生t检验进行每日配对比较。对数转换与Pearson的互相关之后,配对的空气传播的孢子水平被2比2关联。用κ系数(κ)计算一致性。 3个室外HTST采样的总真菌载量(TFL)为3,025.0、3,287.5和3,625.0颗粒/ m 3 (P = 0.6、0.6和0.3)。曲霉+青霉属(κ= 0.2)低。在使用室外HTST和室内HTST采样的TFL之间存在4小时的时滞,发现低正相关,r = 0.30,95%CI(0.23-0.43),P <0.001。在室内空气中,曲霉属。活的冲击取样器在63.1%的样品中检测到AFL,而HTST-I在3.6%的样品中发现了AFL。曲霉属之间的一致性。用两种方法采样的负荷和AFL非常低(κ= 0.1)。这项研究表明,室外和室内TFL的增加之间有4小时的时间间隔,这可能是由于建筑物的隔热和气流引起的。室外HTST可以允许快速识别(48小时后)室外真菌负荷高的时间段。一个已确定的缺点是,读取的样品区域太低似乎无法有效检测曲霉菌的孢子。目前可能不建议使用室内HTST,而室外HTST需要进一步研究。可行的冲击采样器进行空气采样仍然是定量医院室内真菌污染的参考工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号