首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Individual Survival Curves Comparing Subjective and Observed Mortality Risks
【2h】

Individual Survival Curves Comparing Subjective and Observed Mortality Risks

机译:个人生存曲线比较主观和观察到的死亡率风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compare individual survival curves constructed from objective (actual mortality) and elicited subjective information (probability of survival to a given target age). We develop a methodology to estimate jointly subjective and objective individual survival curves accounting for rounding on subjective reports of perceived survival. We make use of the long follow-up period in the Health and Retirement Study and the high quality of mortality data to estimate individual survival curves which feature both observed and unobserved heterogeneity. This allows us to compare objective and subjective estimates of remaining life expectancy for various groups and compare welfare effects of objective and subjective mortality risk using the life-cycle model of consumption. We find that subjective and objective hazards are not the same. The median welfare loss from misperceptions of mortality risk when annuities are not available is 7% of current wealth at age 65 while more than 25% of respondents have losses larger than 60% of wealth. When annuities are available and exogenously given, the welfare loss is substantially lower.
机译:我们比较了从客观(实际死亡率)和得出的主观信息(到给定目标年龄的生存概率)构建的个体生存曲线。我们开发了一种方法来共同估算主观和客观的个体生存曲线,从而考虑到了感知生存的主观报告。我们利用《健康与退休研究》中较长的随访时间和高质量的死亡率数据来估计具有观察到的和未观察到的异质性的个体生存曲线。这使我们能够比较各个群体的剩余寿命的客观和主观估计,并使用消费的生命周期模型比较客观和主观死亡率风险的福利影响。我们发现主观和客观上的危害并不相同。在没有年金的情况下,由于对死亡风险的误解而造成的福利损失中位数是65岁时当前财富的7%,而超过25%的受访者的损失大于财富的60%。当可获得年金并外生年金时,福利损失大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号