首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Handling of thermal paper: Implications for dermal exposure to bisphenol A and its alternatives
【2h】

Handling of thermal paper: Implications for dermal exposure to bisphenol A and its alternatives

机译:热敏纸的处理:皮肤接触双酚A及其替代品的含义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine disrupting chemical used in a wide range of consumer products including photoactive dyes used in thermal paper. Recent studies have shown that dermal absorption of BPA can occur when handling these papers. Yet, regulatory agencies have largely dismissed thermal paper as a major source of BPA exposure. Exposure estimates provided by agencies such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) are based on assumptions about how humans interact with this material, stating that ‘typical’ exposures for adults involve only one handling per day for short periods of time (<1 minute), with limited exposure surfaces (three fingertips). The objective of this study was to determine how individuals handle thermal paper in one common setting: a cafeteria providing short-order meals. We observed thermal paper handling in a college-aged population (n = 698 subjects) at the University of Massachusetts’ dining facility. We find that in this setting, individuals handle receipts for an average of 11.5 min, that >30% of individuals hold thermal paper with more than three fingertips, and >60% allow the paper to touch their palm. Only 11% of the participants we observed were consistent with the EFSA model for time of contact and dermal surface area. Mathematical modeling based on handling times we measured and previously published transfer coefficients, concentrations of BPA in paper, and absorption factors indicate the most conservative estimated intake from handling thermal paper in this population is 51.1 ng/kg/day, similar to EFSA’s estimates of 59 ng/kg/day from dermal exposures. Less conservative estimates, using published data on concentrations in thermal paper and transfer rates to skin, indicate that exposures are likely significantly higher. Based on our observational data, we propose that the current models for estimating dermal BPA exposures are not consistent with normal human behavior and should be reevaluated.
机译:双酚A(BPA)是一种破坏内分泌的化学物质,广泛用于各种消费产品,包括热敏纸中使用的光敏染料。最近的研究表明,处理这些文件时会发生BPA的皮肤吸收。然而,监管机构在很大程度上不认为热敏纸是BPA暴露的主要来源。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)等机构提供的暴露估计基于人类与这种物质相互作用的假设,指出成年人的“典型”暴露在短时间内(<1分钟)每天仅涉及一次处理),且暴露表面有限(三个指尖)。这项研究的目的是确定个人如何在一种常见的环境中处理热敏纸:提供短餐的自助餐厅。我们在马萨诸塞州大学的就餐场所观察到大学年龄段(n = 698个科目)的热敏纸处理情况。我们发现,在这种情况下,个人平均处理收据的时间为11.5分钟,> 30%的人拿着超过三个指尖的热敏纸,而> 60%的人则允许纸触摸他们的手掌。我们观察到的参与者中只有11%与接触时间和皮肤表面积的EFSA模型一致。根据我们测量的处理时间和先前发布的传输系数,纸张中BPA的浓度以及吸收系数的数学模型表明,该人群中处理热敏纸的最保守估计摄入量为51.1 ng / kg /天,类似于EFSA的估计值59 ng / kg /天。使用公开的热敏纸浓度和向皮肤的传输速率得出的数据,保守程度较低的估算表明,暴露量可能大大增加。根据我们的观察数据,我们建议当前估计皮肤BPA暴露的模型与正常的人类行为不一致,应重新评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号