首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of molecular diagnostic approaches for the detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations in papillary thyroid cancer: Clinical implications
【2h】

Evaluation of molecular diagnostic approaches for the detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations in papillary thyroid cancer: Clinical implications

机译:评估甲状腺乳头状癌BRAF p.V600E突变的分子诊断方法的临床意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Differentiated papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common cancer of the endocrine system. PTC has a very good prognosis and a high 5 year survival rate; however, some patients are unresponsive to treatment, and their diagnosis eventually results in death. Recent efforts have focused on searching for prognostic and predictive factors that may enable treatment personalization and monitoring across the course of the disease. The presence of the BRAF mutation is considered to contribute to the risk of poor clinical course, according to American Thyroid Association (ATA) recommendations. The method used for genotyping can impact the predicted mutation frequency; however, ATA recommendations do not address this issue. We evaluated the molecular diagnostic (BRAF p.V600E mutation) results of 410 patients treated for PTC. We thoroughly analyzed the impact of three different BRAF mutation detection methods, Sanger Sequencing (Seq), allele-specific amplification PCR (ASA-PCR), and quantitative PCR (qPCR), on the frequency of mutation detection in 399 patients. Using Seq, we detected the BRAF mutation in 37% of patients; however, we were able to detect BRAF mutations in 57% and 60% of patients using the more sensitive ASA-PCR and qPCR technologies, respectively. Differences between methods were particularly marked in the thyroid papillary microcarcinoma group; BRAF p.V600E mutations were found in 37% of patients using Seq and 63% and 66% of patients using ASA-PCR and qPCR, respectively. We also evaluated how these different diagnostic methods were impacted by DNA quality. Applying methods with different sensitivities to the detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations may result in different results for the same patient; such data can influence stratification of patients into different risk groups, leading to alteration of treatment and follow-up schemes.
机译:分化型乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)是内分泌系统最常见的癌症。 PTC的预后非常好,五年生存率很高;但是,有些患者对治疗无反应,其诊断最终导致死亡。最近的努力集中在寻找可能使治疗个性化和监测整个疾病过程的预后和预测因素。根据美国甲状腺协会(ATA)的建议,BRAF突变的存在被认为可能导致不良的临床病程。基因分型方法会影响预测的突变频率。但是,ATA建议并未解决此问题。我们评估了410例接受PTC治疗的患者的分子诊断(BRAF p.V600E突变)结果。我们彻底分析了三种不同的BRAF突变检测方法Sanger测序(Seq),等位基因特异性扩增PCR(ASA-PCR)和定量PCR(qPCR)对399例患者突变检测频率的影响。使用Seq,我们在37%的患者中检测到BRAF突变;但是,我们能够使用更灵敏的ASA-PCR和qPCR技术分别检测到57%和60%的患者的BRAF突变。在甲状腺乳头状微癌组中,方法之间的差异尤为明显。在使用Seq的患者中发现37%的患者出现BRAF p.V600E突变,在使用ASA-PCR和qPCR的患者中发现分别为63%和66%的患者。我们还评估了这些不同的诊断方法如何受到DNA质量的影响。将不同敏感性的方法应用于BRAF p.V600E突变的检测对于同一患者可能导致不同的结果。这些数据可能会影响将患者分为不同的风险组,从而导致治疗方法和随访方案的改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号