首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >CARE MANAGERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ACP BARRIERS AND BENEFITS: NUANCES FROM A MIXED METHODS ANALYSIS
【2h】

CARE MANAGERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ACP BARRIERS AND BENEFITS: NUANCES FROM A MIXED METHODS ANALYSIS

机译:护理人员对ACP障碍和利益的看法:混合方法分析的细微差别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Barriers and benefits of advance care planning (ACP) experienced by Area Agency on Aging (AAA) care managers (CMs) were analyzed from a mixed methods approach. This methodology is used to acquire a deeper understanding of perspectives and practices related to ACP, and to identify nuances between quantitative and qualitative data. A two-part study was conducted with CMs; 458 participated in a survey, and 62 also participated in one of 8 focus groups.Results from both surveys and focus groups showed that CMs felt knowledgeable about ACP. CMs were generally comfortable (67%) and confident (67%) when discussing ACP, and qualitative data confirmed that comfort levels tended to rise with experience and personal history with consumers. While ACP was not always easy, and there were some who were uncomfortable due to cultural factors, CMs recognized that consumers were generally comfortable with dying and found value in ACP. While surveys indicated 78% disagreed that ACP takes too much time, qualitative data revealed a more moderate position: some reported time was a “big barrier,” and when others placed ACP as a priority, there was not enough time for other obligations. Finally, CMs recognized their important role in a team-based approach to ACP (64%), despite the fact that they wished physicians would take a more active role.Mixed methods analysis helps unravel complex nuances of CMs perceptions about ACP. In this study, CMs reported their attitudes about ACP, which were confirmed through a rigorous grounded theory qualitative analysis of focus group discussions.
机译:从混合方法方法分析了老年地区管理局(AAA)的护理经理(CM)经历的预先护理计划(ACP)的障碍和收益。使用该方法学可以更深入地了解与ACP相关的观点和实践,并确定定量和定性数据之间的细微差别。对CM进行了分为两部分的研究; 458名参与者参加了调查,并且62名参与者还参加了8个焦点小组之一。调查和焦点小组的结果都表明CM对ACP有所了解。在讨论ACP时,CM总体上感到舒适(67%)和自信(67%),定性数据证实,舒适度会随着消费者的经验和个人历史而上升。尽管ACP并不总是那么容易,而且由于文化因素有些人不舒服,但CM认为消费者通常对死亡感到满意,并发现了ACP的价值。虽然调查表明78%的人不同意ACP花费的时间过多,但定性数据显示情况较为温和:一些报告的时间是“大障碍”,而当其他人将ACP列为优先事项时,没有足够的时间承担其他义务。最后,尽管他们希望医生扮演更积极的角色,但CM仍然认识到他们在基于团队的ACP方法中的重要作用(64%)。混合方法分析有助于阐明CM对ACP的理解的细微差别。在这项研究中,CM报告了他们对ACP的态度,这一点通过对焦点小组讨论的严格扎根的理论定性分析得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号