首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >ASSESSING PALLIATIVE CARE DELIVERY IN A NEURO ICU: PREDICTING END-OF-LIFE EXPERTISE
【2h】

ASSESSING PALLIATIVE CARE DELIVERY IN A NEURO ICU: PREDICTING END-OF-LIFE EXPERTISE

机译:评估NEURO ICU的姑息性护理交付:预测生命终期专业知识

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study assesses palliative care implementation in the Neuro ICU of a large medical center. The expectation of death at admission is high, making comprehensive palliative care vital. The aim was to examine how providers’ views of palliative care are related to their end-of-life (EOL) expertise. Forty-one providers responded to 25 questions (Likert-type scales) concerning their views of palliative care delivery. EOL expertise (e.g., ethical issues, clear definition of palliative care, avoiding futile care) was also assessed. Exploratory factor analysis of views of care delivery (Varimax rotation, 44.26% variance explained) resulted in three factors reflective of increasing levels of palliative care provision: initiating the process, providing basic comfort-care, and delivering holistic care. Linear regression analyses used these three factors to predict EOL expertise. Endorsing Delivery of Holistic Care predicts the use of ethics consults to aid complex care decisions (B = .96, p = .001) and avoidance of administering futile care (B = .68, p = .05). Endorsing Provision of Basic Comfort Care predicts greater previous palliative care involvement (B = 1.23, p = .008). Endorsing Initiation of the Process predicts having a more comprehensive definition of palliative care (B = 2.34, p = .005) and of Advance Directives (B = 1.23, p = .013). Results suggest that different ways of viewing palliative care exist even within a single unit and that these views are related to providers’ expertise in dealing with ethical issues, end of life planning, and delivery of care.
机译:这项研究评估了大型医疗中心神经ICU中的姑息治疗实施情况。入院时对死亡的期望很高,因此全面的姑息治疗至关重要。目的是研究提供者对姑息治疗的看法如何与他们的临终(EOL)专业知识相关联。 41名提供者回答了25个有关他们对姑息治疗服务的看法的问题(利克特式量表)。还评估了EOL专业知识(例如,道德问题,对姑息治疗的明确定义,避免徒劳的治疗)。对护理提供的观点进行探索性因素分析(Varimax轮换,解释了44.26%的差异)产生了三个因素,这些信息反映了姑息治疗提供水平的提高:启动流程,提供基本的舒适护理和提供整体护理。线性回归分析使用这三个因素来预测EOL专业知识。认可整体护理的交付预计可以使用道德咨询来帮助做出复杂的护理决定(B = .96,p = .001)并避免进行徒劳的护理(B = .68,p = .05)。认可基本舒适护理的规定可以预测以前有更多的姑息治疗参与(B = 1.23,p = .008)。批准启动程序可预测对姑息治疗(B = 2.34,p = .005)和预先指示(B = 1.23,p = .013)有更全面的定义。结果表明,即使在一个单位内,也存在不同的方式来查看姑息治疗,并且这些观点与医疗服务提供者在处理道德问题,生命周期规划和护理提供方面的专业知识有关。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 511
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号