首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >CONFLICTING MEANINGS OF CARE: INSIGHTS FROM CULTURAL GERONTOLOGY AND CRITICAL THEORY
【2h】

CONFLICTING MEANINGS OF CARE: INSIGHTS FROM CULTURAL GERONTOLOGY AND CRITICAL THEORY

机译:关心冲突的含义:来自文化地质学和批判理论的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multiple and conflicting meanings of ‘care’ circulate in an array of social sciences and humanities disciplines. In varied theorizing and empirical studies, care refers to a gendered form of labour that is socially devalued and poorly compensated. In the lively feminist ethics of care scholarship, care refers to a relational ethics that can radically transform individual moral codes, policy frameworks and even international relations in contrast to prevailing justice-based ethics systems. It is also frequently used without reflection in many healthcare contexts to refer to the material tasks of healthcare as well as an indicator of quality. Perhaps most controversially, in disability studies and activism care is regarded a complex form of oppression with roots and ongoing links to mass institutionalization, paternalism, and other systemic exclusions of differing embodiments. This symposium draws on cultural gerontology and critical theory to consider the contested terrain around ‘care’ in relation to aging in conceptual, policy and practices settings. In doing so, we help to both complicate and clarify ‘care’ to challenge theorists, practitioners and researchers to consider the weighty history and implications of terminology that often circulates without pause. Further, we call on the audience to consider what these conflicting and complex meanings of care might mean for their own practice and work.
机译:“护理”的多重和冲突含义在一系列社会科学和人文学科中流传。在各种理论和实证研究中,护理是指社会贬值且补偿不力的性别劳动形式。在活跃的护理学女性主义伦理学中,护理是指一种关系伦理学,与现行的基于正义的伦理学体系相比,它可以从根本上改变个人的道德准则,政策框架甚至国际关系。在许多医疗保健环境中,它也经常被使用而无需反思,以指代医疗保健的实质任务以及质量指标。也许最有争议的是,在残疾研究和行动主义护理中,护理被认为是一种复杂的压迫形式,其根源是与大众化,家长式教育以及不同实施方式的其他系统性排斥的持续联系。本次研讨会利用文化老年学和批判理论来考虑在“护理”方面存在争议的领域,与概念,政策和实践环境中的衰老有关。在这样做的过程中,我们有助于使“护理”复杂化和明确化,以挑战理论家,实践者和研究人员,以考虑经常传播而又不停顿的沉重历史和术语含义。此外,我们呼吁听众考虑这些矛盾和复杂的护理含义可能对他们自己的实践和工作意味着什么。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Chair: C. Kelly;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 680
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-21 11:09:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号