首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >AGE EFFECTS ON CONSUMER’S EVALUATION OF RISK AND BENEFITS IN SWEEPSTAKES SCAMS
【2h】

AGE EFFECTS ON CONSUMER’S EVALUATION OF RISK AND BENEFITS IN SWEEPSTAKES SCAMS

机译:消费者对抽奖活动中风险和收益评估的年龄影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Advance-fee fraud schemes are based on the concept that the victim will be promised a substantial benefit, such as a sweepstakes winning, but must pay a fee before the victim can receive the benefit. With the global population growing older, sweepstakes scammers have been targeting older adults’ wealth, and the scam becomes one of the top 10 senior scams. A laboratory-based approach was developed to study the very initial steps of the advance fee scam with an emphasis on evaluation of risk and benefit assessment. Three-hundred-and-two adults (age range 18–83), recruited on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, were randomly assigned into one of the three conditions (low, medium, or high activation fee), informed to read a lottery-winning letter, then were asked to answer some questions about its content. Overall, we found 27.2% participants indicating willingness to contact the sweepstakes company in order to “activate” the winnings. Age and activation fee amount predicted contact likelihood in the same regression model, such that older adults were less likely to comply (b=-.032, p=.001), while high activation fee deterred participants from calling (b=-.384, p=.010). However, both effects disappeared when quantitative ratings of risk and benefits were entered into the model. Assessment of higher risk discouraged contact (b=-.583, p<.001), but higher benefit assessment was associated with contact (b=.407, p<.001). Participants were often aware that many of these pitches are scams, but unaware that the main goal of the scammers is to obtain contact information for future requests.
机译:预先收费欺诈计划是基于这样的概念,即将向受害人保证会带来可观的收益,例如中奖,但必须在受害人获得收益之前支付一定费用。随着全球人口的年龄增长,抽奖诈骗者一直以老年人的财富为目标,该骗局成为十大老年人骗局之一。开发了一种基于实验室的方法来研究预付费骗局的最初步骤,重点是评估风险和收益评估。在亚马逊的Turk上招募的三百二十个成年人(年龄在18-83岁之间)被随机分配到以下三种条件之一(低,中或高激活费),并告知他们阅读中奖信,然后要求他们回答有关其内容的一些问题。总体而言,我们发现27.2%的参与者表示愿意与抽奖公司联系以“激活”奖金。年龄和激活费金额在同一回归模型中预测了接触的可能性,因此,老年人不太可能遵守(b =-。032,p = .001),而高激活费会阻止参与者打电话(b =-。384) ,p = .010)。但是,当将风险和收益的定量评级输入模型时,两种影响都消失了。较高风险的评估不鼓励接触(b =-。583,p <.001),但较高的收益评估与接触有关(b = .407,p <.001)。参与者经常意识到,这些宣传中有许多是骗局,但并未意识到骗子的主要目标是获取联系信息以备将来之用。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    S. Wood; L. Klapatch; P. Xi; M. Liu;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 364
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号