首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico’s 8 nonessential food tax
【2h】

Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico’s 8 nonessential food tax

机译:高购买者和低购买者对不必要的能源密集型食品税的反应不同吗?对墨西哥8%非必需食品税的两年评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is unclear whether response to a nonessential food tax varies across time or for high vs. low-consuming households. The objective is to examine whether the effect of Mexico’s 2014 8% nonessential energy-dense foods tax increased in the second year post-implementation and whether it differentially affected households by pre-tax purchasing pattern. We used longitudinal data on Mexican household food purchases (n=6089 households) from 2012–2015. Households were classified based on median pre-tax purchases: low untaxed/low taxed (“low”), low untaxed/high taxed (“unhealthy”), high untaxed/low taxed (“healthy”), and high untaxed/high taxed (“high”) purchasers. Fixed effects models tested whether observed post-tax purchases differed from the counterfactual, or what would have been expected based on pre-tax trends. Post-tax declines in the % taxed food purchases increased from −4.8% in year one to −7.4% in year two, yielding a 2-year mean decline of 6.0% beyond the counterfactual (p<0.01). Post-tax change in % taxed food purchases varied by pre-tax purchasing level. Healthy purchasers showed no post-tax change in % taxed food purchases beyond the counterfactual, while unhealthy, low and high purchasers decreased (−12.3%, −5.3% and −4.4%, respectively) (p<0.01). The positive effect of Mexico’s junk food tax continued in the second year, and households with greater preferences for taxed foods showed a larger decline in taxed food purchases.
机译:目前尚不清楚对非必需食品税的反应会随时间变化还是针对高消费家庭与低消费家庭而变化。目的是研究实施后第二年墨西哥2014年8%的非必需能源密集型食品税的影响是否增加,以及是否通过税前购买方式对家庭产生了不同影响。我们使用了2012-2015年间墨西哥家庭食物购买(n = 6089户)的纵向数据。家庭根据税前购买的中位数进行分类:低税率/低税率(“低”),低税率/高税率(“不健康”),高税率/低税率(“健康”)和高税率/高税率(“高”)购买者。固定效应模型测试了观察到的税后购买与反事实购买是否不同,或者根据税前趋势预期了什么。税后食品购买百分比的税后下降从第一年的-4.8%增加到第二年的-7.4%,产生了2年平均下降幅度,超出反事实(p <0.01)。税后食品购买百分比的税后变化因税前购买水平而异。健康的购买者没有发现超出事实的税后食品购买百分比的税后变化,而不健康的购买者,低购买者和高购买者则减少了(分别为-12.3%,-5.3%和-4.4%)(p <0.01)。墨西哥的垃圾食品税在第二年继续发挥了积极的作用,对税收食品有较高偏好的家庭表明,购买税收食品的下降幅度更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号