首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants
【2h】

Familiarization Protocol Influences Reproducibility of 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Novice Participants

机译:熟悉协议会影响新手参与者20公里自行车计时赛性能的可重复性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Exercise performance is reproducible in experienced athletes; however, less trained participants exhibit greater variability in performance and pacing. To reduce variability, it is common practice to complete a familiarization prior to experimental testing. However, there are no clear guidelines for familiarizing novice participants to a cycling time-trial (TT), and research findings from novice populations may still be influenced by learning effects. Accordingly, the aims of this study were to establish the variability between TTs after administering differing familiarization protocols (duration or type) and to establish the number of familiarization trials required to limit variability over multiple trials.>Methods: Thirty recreationally active participants, with no prior experience of a TT, performed a 20-km cycling TT on five separate occasions, after completing either a full (FF, 20-km TT, n = 10), a half (HF, 10-km TT, n = 10) or an equipment familiarization (EF, 5-min cycling, n = 10).>Results: Variability of TT duration across five TTs was the lowest after completing FF (P = 0.69, ηp2 = 0.05) compared to HF (P = 0.08, ηp2 = 0.26) and EF (P = 0.07, ηp2 = 0.21). In the FF group after TT2, the effect size for changes in TT duration was small (d < 0.49). There were large differences between later TTs in HF (d = 1.02, TT3-TT4) and EF (d = 1.12, TT4-TT5). The variability in mean power output profiles between trials was lowest within FF, with a similar pacing profile reproduced between TT3-TT5.>Discussion: Familiarization of the exercise protocol influenced reproducibility of pacing and performance over multiple, maximal TTs, with best results obtained after a full experience of the exercise compared to HF and EF. The difference of TT1 to later TTs indicates that one familiarization is not adequate in reducing the variability of performance for novice participants. After the FF and an additional TT, performance changes between TTs were small, however, a reproducible pacing profile was not developed until after the FF and two additional TTs. These findings indicate that a minimum of three full familiarizations are necessary for novice participants to limit systematic error before experimental testing.
机译:>简介:有经验的运动员的运动表现可重复;然而,受过较少训练的参与者表现出更大的表现和节奏差异。为了减少差异,通常的做法是在进行实验测试之前先熟悉一下。但是,尚无明确的指南来使新手参与者熟悉骑车时间试验(TT),并且新手人群的研究结果仍可能受到学习效果的影响。因此,本研究的目的是在施用不同的熟悉协议(持续时间或类型)后确定TT之间的差异,并确定限制多个试验之间的差异所需的熟悉试验的数量。>方法:在没有完成TT经验的情况下进行娱乐活动的参与者,在完成完整(FF,20 km TT,n = 10),一半(HF,10 km)后,在五个不同的场合进行了20 km的自行车TT TT,n = 10)或熟悉设备(EF,5分钟循环,n = 10)。>结果:完成FF后,五个TT中TT持续时间的变异性最低(P = 0.69, ηp 2 = 0.05),而HF(P = 0.08,ηp 2 = 0.26)和EF(P = 0.07,ηp 2 = 0.21) )。在TT2之后的FF组中,TT持续时间变化的影响大小很小(d <0.49)。 HF(d = 1.02,TT3-TT4)和EF(d = 1.12,TT4-TT5)之后的TTs之间存在较大差异。试验之间的平均功率输出曲线的差异在FF内最低,在TT3-TT5之间重现了类似的起搏曲线。>讨论:锻炼方案的熟悉会影响多次最大TT的起搏的可重复性和性能。 ,与HF和EF相比,经过全面的运动后可获得最佳效果。 TT1与后来的TT的差异表明,一次熟悉不足以减少新手参与者的表现差异。在FF和额外的TT之后,TT之间的性能变化很小,但是,直到FF和另外两个TT之后,才出现可再现的起搏配置文件。这些发现表明,对于新手参加者来说,在实验测试之前限制其系统性错误至少需要进行三个充分的熟悉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号