首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Reduced statherin in acquired enamel pellicle on eroded teeth compared to healthy teeth in the same subjects: An in-vivo study
【2h】

Reduced statherin in acquired enamel pellicle on eroded teeth compared to healthy teeth in the same subjects: An in-vivo study

机译:体内研究显示与健康牙齿相比侵蚀牙齿上获得的牙釉质防护膜中的斯大林减少了

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this in-vivo study was to compare total protein and four key salivary proteins present in the acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) on eroded and non-eroded surfaces in participants with erosive tooth wear. Participants with erosive tooth wear of dietary non-intrinsic origin, present on the occlusal surfaces of the lower first molars and an unaffected posterior occlusal surface in the same quadrant were recruited from restorative dental clinics at King’s College London Dental Institute (n = 29, REC ref 14/EM/1171). Following removal of the salivary film, AEP samples were collected from the eroded occlusal surfaces (EP, n = 29) and the non-eroded occlusal surfaces (NP, n = 29) using 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) soaked filter papers. Total protein concentration was analysed using bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA). Protein fractions were separated using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted against: mucin5b, albumin, carbonic anhydrase VI (CA VI) and statherin antibodies. Amounts were quantified using ImageLab software against purified protein standards of known concentration. ANOVA followed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon’s matched-pair signed-rank test were used to test statistical significance. The difference was considered to be significant at a P value < 0.05. The total protein on eroded surfaces was significantly lower compared to the total protein on non-eroded surfaces [0.41mg/mL (0.04) and 0.61 mg/mL (0.11)] respectively (p< 0.05). The median (min, max) amount of statherin was also significantly lower on eroded occlusal surfaces [84.1 (20.0, 221.8) ng] compared to AEP from non-eroded teeth in the same subjects [97.1(30.0, 755.6) ng] (p = 0.002). No statistical differences were observed for mucin 5b, albumin or CA VI. The total protein and statherin in the in-vivo AEP were different between eroded and non-eroded tooth surfaces of the same patient.
机译:这项体内研究的目的是比较患有磨蚀性牙齿磨损的参与者在磨蚀和未磨蚀表面上获得的牙釉质防护膜(AEP)中存在的总蛋白质和四种主要唾液蛋白。在同一象限的下第一磨牙的咬合面和未受影响的后牙合面中存在饮食非本源性侵蚀性牙齿磨损的参与者是从伦敦国王学院牙科学院的修复牙齿诊所招募的(n = 29,REC参考14 / EM / 1171)。去除唾液膜后,使用浸有0.5%十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)的滤纸从侵蚀的咬合面(EP,n = 29)和未侵蚀的咬合面(NP,n = 29)收集AEP样品。使用二辛可宁酸测定法(BCA)分析总蛋白浓度。使用SDS-PAGE分离蛋白质级分,并针对mucin5b,白蛋白,碳酸酐酶VI(CA VI)和statherin抗体进行免疫印迹。使用ImageLab软件针对已知浓度的纯化蛋白标准品定量。方差分析,配对t检验和Wilcoxon配对配对带秩检验用于检验统计学显着性。在P值<0.05时,差异被认为是显着的。与未腐蚀表面上的总蛋白相比,被腐蚀表面上的总蛋白分别显着降低[0.41mg / mL(0.04)和0.61 mg / mL(0.11)](p <0.05)。与相同受试者的非侵蚀性牙齿的AEP相比,在侵蚀性咬合面上的中度(最小,最大)量的兽斑素[84.1(20.0,221.8)ng]显着降低[97.1(30.0,755.6)ng](p = 0.002)。对于粘蛋白5b,白蛋白或CA VI,未观察到统计学差异。同一患者的侵蚀和非侵蚀牙齿表面中,体内AEP中的总蛋白质和兽斑素不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号