首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Lacanian Concept of Paranoia: An Historical Perspective
【2h】

The Lacanian Concept of Paranoia: An Historical Perspective

机译:拉康妄想症的概念:历史视角

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article seeks to reopen a major question raised by the Lacanian nosology of the psychoses, by looking closely at Lacan’s formulations of what he never ceased referring to as “paranoia”. While almost all classification systems of modern psychiatry, such as the ICD-10 and the DSM-5, have abandoned the specific category of paranoia, Lacan always viewed paranoia as a major category of “functional psychosis”. He held that paranoia was a qualitatively different disorder than schizophrenia, and considered it to be the principal or exemplary form of psychosis. Furthermore, in the middle period of his work, Lacan thought of paranoia in much broader terms than those of the definition proposed by Kraepelin, which he revisited, point by point, developing his theory of Freud’s concept of “Verwerfung” or foreclosure; the latter became the focal diagnostic criterion in his nosographic construction. Lacan’s privileging of and evolving theoretical views on paranoia provide a structural approach to what he called the “resistant nucleus” of psychosis; his work serves as a counterpoint to the more descriptive neo-Kraepelinian approach of contemporary psychiatric nosology.
机译:本文试图通过仔细观察拉康对他从未停止过的“偏执狂”的表述,来重新讨论拉康主义精神病学领域提出的一个主要问题。尽管几乎所有现代精神病学分类系统(例如ICD-10和DSM-5)都放弃了偏执狂的特定类别,但拉康始终将偏执狂视为“功能性精神病”的主要类别。他认为偏执狂是一种与精神分裂症本质上不同的疾病,他认为这是精神病的主要形式或典范。此外,在工作的中期,拉康对妄想症的理解要比对克雷佩林提出的定义更为宽泛,他对克洛佩林的定义进行了逐点回顾,发展了弗洛伊德的“ Verwerfung”或止赎概念。后者成为了他的鼻子学构造的重点诊断标准。拉康对偏执狂的轻视和不断发展的理论观点为他所谓的精神病的“抵抗性核”提供了结构性方法。他的工作与当代精神病学更具描述性的新克莱佩林主义方法背道而驰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号