首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Impact of a brief intervention on reducing alcohol use and increasing alcohol treatment services utilization among alcohol- and drug-using adult emergency department patients
【2h】

Impact of a brief intervention on reducing alcohol use and increasing alcohol treatment services utilization among alcohol- and drug-using adult emergency department patients

机译:短暂干预对减少使用酒精和毒品的成人急诊科患者的酒精使用和增加酒精治疗服务利用率的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most previous brief intervention (BI) studies have focused on alcohol or drug use, instead of both substances. Our primary aim was to determine if an alcohol and drug use BI reduced alcohol use and increased alcohol treatment services utilization among adult emergency department (ED) patients. Our secondary aims were to assess when the greatest relative reductions in alcohol use occurred, and which patients (stratified by need for an alcohol use intervention) reduced their alcohol use the most. We studied a sub-sample of participants from a randomized, controlled trial of a BI vs. no BI whose responses to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) indicated a need for a BI for any drug use and who also reported alcohol use. Participants were stratified by their ASSIST alcohol subscore: (1) no BI needed, (2) a BI needed, or (3) an intensive intervention needed for alcohol use. Alcohol use and alcohol treatment services utilization were measured every three months for 12 months post-enrollment. Of these 833 participants, median age was 29 years-old, 46% were female; 55% were whiteon-Hispanic, 27% blackon-Hispanic and 15% Hispanic. Although any alcohol use, alcohol use frequency, days of alcohol use, typical drinks consumed/day, and most drinks consumed/day decreased in both the BI and no BI arms, there were no differences between study arms. Few patients sought alcohol use treatment services in follow-up, and utilization also did not differ by study arm. Compared to baseline, alcohol use reduced the most during the first three months after enrollment, yet reduced little afterwards. Participants whose ASSIST alcohol subscores indicated a need for an intensive intervention generally had the greatest relative decreases in alcohol use. These results indicate that the BI used was not efficacious in reducing alcohol use among alcohol- and drug-using adult ED patients. There is a need to develop and test more robust interventions.
机译:以前的大多数简短干预(BI)研究都集中于酒精或毒品的使用,而不是两种物质。我们的主要目的是确定在成人急诊室(ED)患者中,酒精和药物滥用BI是否会减少酒精使用并增加酒精治疗服务的利用率。我们的次要目标是评估何时最大程度地减少了酒精使用量,以及哪些患者(因需要进行酒精使用干预而分层)最大程度地减少了酒精使用量。我们研究了来自BI与无BI的随机对照试验的参与者子样本,其对酒精,吸烟和物质参与筛查测试(ASSIST)的回答表明,任何药物使用都需要BI,并且该人还报告了饮酒。参与者按他们的ASSIST酒精饮料评分进行分层:(1)不需要BI,(2)不需要BI,或(3)酒精使用不需任何干预。在注册后的12个月中,每三个月测量一次酒精使用和酒精处理服务的利用率。在这833名参与者中,中位年龄为29岁,女性为46%; 55%是白人/非西班牙裔,27%黑人/非西班牙裔和15%西班牙裔。尽管在BI组和无BI组中任何酒精使用量,酒精使用频率,酒精使用天数,每天消耗的典型饮料和每天消耗的大多数饮料都减少了,但研究组之间没有差异。很少有患者在随访中寻求酒精使用治疗服务,并且研究组的使用情况也没有差异。与基线相比,入学后头三个月的酒精使用量减少最多,但此后很少减少。参与者的ASSIST酒精评分表示需要加强干预的患者,其酒精使用量相对减少最多。这些结果表明,在使用酒精和药物的成年ED患者中,使用的BI不能有效减少酒精的使用。有必要开发和测试更强大的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号