首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Can ultrasound elastography identify mass-like focal fatty change (FFC) from liver mass?
【2h】

Can ultrasound elastography identify mass-like focal fatty change (FFC) from liver mass?

机译:超声弹性成像可以从肝脏肿块中识别出类似肿块的局灶性脂肪变化(FFC)吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Focal fatty change (FFC) may mimic liver mass on conventional B-mode ultrasound. Clinical differentiation of mass-like FFC and liver mass is important due to different clinical interventions. Contrast-enhanced imaging (CEI) or biopsy is reliable for this differentiation, but is expensive and invasive. This study aimed to explore utilities of ultrasound elastography for this differentiation.This study enrolled 79 patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs), of which 26 were mass-like FFC confirmed by at least 2 CEI modalities. The other 53 were liver masses, confirmed by pathology (n = 28) or at least 2 CEI modalities (n = 25). Lesion stiffness value (SV), absolute stiffness difference (ASD), and stiffness ratio (SR) of lesion to background were obtained using point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and compared between FFC group and liver mass group. The performance of SV, ASD, and SR for identifying FFC from liver mass was evaluated.SV was 5.6 ± 2.4 versus 16 ± 12 kPa, ASD was 2.0 ± 1.9 versus 11 ± 12 kPa, and SR was 1.4 ± 0.6 versus 3.0 ± 1.9 for FFC and liver mass group, respectively (P < .0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SV, ASD, and SR for discriminating mass-like FFC and liver mass was 0.840, 0.842, and 0.791, respectively (P < .05). Particularly, with cut-off ASD < 1.0 kPa, positive predictive value was 100%, specificity was 100%, and accuracy was 82% for diagnosing FFC.pSWE may be a potential useful modality for identifying mass-like FFC from liver mass, which might help reduce the necessity for further CEI or biopsy for diagnosing mass-like FFC.
机译:局灶性脂肪变化(FFC)可以模仿常规B型超声检查的肝脏质量。由于不同的临床干预措施,肿块样FFC和肝肿块的临床区分很重要。造影增强成像(CEI)或活检对于这种区分是可靠的,但昂贵且具有侵入性。这项研究旨在探讨超声弹性成像技术在分化中的作用。该研究招募了79例局灶性肝病灶(FLL)患者,其中26例通过至少2种CEI方式证实为块状FFC。其他53例为肝脏肿块,经病理证实(n = 28)或至少2种CEI形式(n = 25)。使用点剪切波弹性成像(pSWE)获得病变的硬挺度值(SV),绝对硬挺差(ASD)和硬挺度比(SR),并在FFC组和肝脏肿块组之间进行比较。评估了SV,ASD和SR从肝脏肿块中识别FFC的性能.SV为5.6±2.4对16±12 kPa,ASD为2.0±1.9对11±12 kPa,SR为1.4±0.6对3.0±1.9 FFC组和肝脏肿块组分别为(P <.0001)。 SV,ASD和SR的接收器工作特征曲线下用于区分类似块状FFC和肝块的面积分别为0.840、0.842和0.791(P <0.05)。尤其是,当ASD≤1.0kkPa时,阳性预测值为100%,特异性为100%,诊断FFC的准确度为82%.pSWE可能是从肝脏肿块中识别肿块样FFC的潜在有用方式。可能有助于减少进行进一步CEI或活检以诊断块状FFC的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号