首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Use of programmable versus nonprogrammable shunts in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus
【2h】

Use of programmable versus nonprogrammable shunts in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus

机译:在常压性脑积水的管理中使用可编程和非可编程分流器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt systems that are used in the treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus are often associated with drainage problems. Adjustable shunt systems can prevent or treat these problems, but they may be expensive. The aim of our study is to compare the complications and total cost of several shunt systems.Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting between 2011 and 2016 were included in the study. The study involves patient consent and the informed consent was given. Complications and the average cost per person were compared between patients with adjustable and nonadjustable shunts. Shunt prices, surgical complications, and revision costs were taken into account to calculate the average cost.Of the 110 patients who were evaluated, 80 had a nonadjustable shunt and 30 had an adjustable shunt. In the group with adjustable shunts, the rates of subdural effusion and hematoma were 19.73% and 3.29%, respectively. In the group with nonadjustable shunts, these rates were 22.75% and 13.75%, respectively. One patient in the adjustable group underwent surgery for subdural hematoma, while 8 patients in the nonadjustable group underwent the same surgery. Ten patients required surgical intervention for subdural effusion and existing shunt systems in these patients were replaced by an adjustable shunt system. When these additional costs were factored into the analysis, the difference in cost between the shunt systems was reduced from 600 United States dollars (USD) to 111 USD.When the complications and additional costs that arise during surgical treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus were considered, the price difference between adjustable and nonadjustable shunt systems was estimated to be much lower.
机译:用于治疗正常压力脑积水的心腹腹膜分流系统通常与引流问题有关。可调式并联系统可以预防或治疗这些问题,但是它们可能很昂贵。我们的研究目的是比较几种分流系统的并发症和总成本.2011年至2016年间接受脑室腹膜分流的常压脑积水患者被纳入研究。该研究涉及患者的同意并给出了知情同意。比较可调节和不可调节分流患者的并发症和人均费用。考虑分流器价格,手术并发症和翻修费用来计算平均费用。在接受评估的110例患者中,有80例是不可调节的分流器,而30例是有可调分流器。在可调分流组中,硬膜下积液和血肿的发生率分别为19.73%和3.29%。在非可调分流组中,这些比率分别为22.75%和13.75%。可调组中的1例患者接受了硬膜下血肿手术,而非可调组中的8例患者接受了相同的手术。十名患者需要进行手术治疗以进行硬膜下积液,这些患者中的现有分流系统被可调分流系统取代。将这些额外费用纳入分析后,分流系统之间的费用差异从600美元减少到111美元。考虑到常压性脑积水的外科手术过程中出现的并发症和额外费用,可调式和非可调式分流系统之间的价格差估计要低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号