首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Long term cognitive outcomes of early term (37-38 weeks) and late preterm (34-36 weeks) births: A systematic review
【2h】

Long term cognitive outcomes of early term (37-38 weeks) and late preterm (34-36 weeks) births: A systematic review

机译:早产(37-38周)和早产(34-36周)的长期认知结果:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: There is a paucity of evidence regarding long-term outcomes of late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early term (37-38 weeks) delivery.  The objective of this systematic review was to assess long-term cognitive outcomes of children born at these gestations. >Methods: Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov and PsycINFO) were searched.  Last search was 5 th August 2016. >  Studies were included if they reported gestational age, IQ measure and the ages assessed.  The protocol was registered with the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO Record ).  Two independent reviewers assessed the studies.  Data were abstracted and critical appraisal performed of eligible papers. >Results: Of 11,905 potential articles, seven studies reporting on 41,344 children were included.  For early term births, four studies (n = 35,711) consistently showed an increase in cognitive scores for infants born at full term (39-41 weeks) compared to those born at early term (37-38 weeks) with increases for each week of term (difference between 37 and 40 weeks of around 3 IQ points), despite differences in age of testing and method of IQ/cognitive testing.  Four studies (n = 5644) reporting childhood cognitive outcomes of late preterm births (34 – 36 weeks) also differed in study design (cohort and case control); age of testing; and method of IQ testing, and found no differences in outcomes between late preterm and term births, although risk of bias was high in included studies. >Conclusion:  Children born at 39-41 weeks have higher cognitive outcome scores compared to those born at early term (37-38 weeks).  This should be considered when discussing timing of delivery.  For children born late preterm, the data is scarce and when compared to full term (37-42 weeks) did not show any difference in IQ scores.
机译:>背景:关于早产(34-36周)和早产(37-38周)的长期结果的证据很少。这项系统评价的目的是评估在这些妊娠期出生的孩子的长期认知结果。 >方法:搜索了四个电子数据库(Medline,Embase,clinicaltrials.gov和PsycINFO)。上次搜索是2016年8月5日。> 如果报告了胎龄,智商测量和评估的年龄,则纳入研究。该协议已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册簿(PROSPERO Record)中进行了注册。两名独立审稿人对研究进行了评估。提取数据并进行合格论文的严格评估。 >结果:在11,905篇潜在文章中,纳入了7项研究,涉及41,344名儿童。对于早产,四项研究(n = 35,711)持续显示,与早产(37-38周)相​​比,足月(39-41周)婴儿的认知得分有所提高。尽管测试年龄和智商/认知测试方法不同,但术语(37到40周的差异大约为3个智商点)。四项研究(n = 5644)报告了早产儿(34-36周)的儿童认知结果在研究设计(人群和病例对照)上也有所不同。测试年龄;智商测试的方法和方法,尽管纳入研究的偏倚风险很高,但早产和足月分娩的结局并无差异。 >结论:与早期(37-38周)出生的孩子相比,在39-41周出生的孩子具有更高的认知结局评分。在讨论交货时间时应考虑到这一点。对于早产儿,数据很少,与足月(37-42周)相比,智商得分没有任何差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号