首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Maybe I Will Just Send a Quick Text… – An Examination of Drivers’ Distractions Causes and Potential Interventions
【2h】

Maybe I Will Just Send a Quick Text… – An Examination of Drivers’ Distractions Causes and Potential Interventions

机译:也许我会发个简短的短信…… –检查驾驶员的分心原因和可能的干预措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many people use cars all over the world. This is, however, not done without risk, as traffic accidents are one of the most common causes of death for adolescents worldwide. The number of deaths has steadily decreased, both worldwide and in Norway. Many of these accidents involve passenger cars and distracted driving. While there are many campaigns to improve safety in traffic, little research has looked at distractions. A recent report has investigated the occurrence of and damage caused by distraction, and one article has looked at what predicts baseline differences in levels of distracted driving. However, no one has tested an intervention to decrease distracted behavior in traffic. Motivational variables suggested by the Theory of Planned Behavior, personality traits, and demographic variables show utility in similar contexts and are all tested in this project. Data from two samples were collected to investigate the nature of distractions in traffic, what factors predict baseline levels of distractions, and to test an intervention to reduce distractions. Both samples feature randomly assigned intervention and control groups. The first sample (n = 1100 total; n = 208 was licensed to drive) consisted of high school students from all over Norway as a part of a larger attitudinal campaign, while the second sample (n = 414) was more general. The second tested a digital version of implementation intentions designed as volitional help sheets. The results from both samples suggest that there are some robust differences between people in how much they are distracted in everyday life, while some variables need further research. The second study failed to uncover any effects of the intervention. Reasons for this are discussed, along with points on the efficacy of digital interventions, the design of the volitional help sheets, and the design of the study in general. Notwithstanding the ineffectual interventions, this study contains novel information about baseline differences in distractive behavior that may further impact future behavior change interventions and guide future research.
机译:世界各地有许多人使用汽车。但是,这并非没有风险,因为交通事故是全世界青少年死亡的最常见原因之一。全世界和挪威的死亡人数都在稳步下降。其中许多事故涉及乘用车和分心驾驶。尽管有许多提高交通安全性的运动,但很少有研究关注这些干扰因素。最近的一份报告调查了分心驾驶的发生和损害,一篇文章研究了预测分心驾驶水平基线差异的因素。但是,没有人测试过干预措施以减少交通中分散注意力的行为。计划行为理论建议的动机变量,人格特质和人口统计学变量在相似的背景下显示出效用,并且在本项目中均经过测试。收集了两个样本的数据,以研究交通干扰因素的性质,预测干扰因素基线水平的因素以及测试减少干扰因素的干预措施。这两个样本均具有随机分配的干预组和对照组。第一个样本(总计n = 1100; n = 208被许可驾驶)由来自挪威各地的高中生组成,这是更大的态度运动的一部分,而第二个样本(n = 414)则更一般。第二个测试了旨在作为自愿帮助表的实施意图的数字版本。这两个样本的结果表明,人们在日常生活中的注意力分散程度存在明显的差异,而一些变量还需要进一步研究。第二项研究未能发现干预措施的任何影响。讨论了这样做的原因,以及有关数字干预效果,自愿帮助表的设计以及总体研究设计的观点。尽管干预措施无效,但本研究仍包含有关分散注意力行为的基线差异的新信息,这可能会进一步影响未来的行为改变干预措施并指导未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号