首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Fixed-flexion view X-ray of the knee superior in detection and follow-up of knee osteoarthritis
【2h】

Fixed-flexion view X-ray of the knee superior in detection and follow-up of knee osteoarthritis

机译:膝关节固定屈曲X线检查在膝骨关节炎的检测和随访中具有优势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A fixed flexion view (FFV) is useful for evaluating joint space when assessing the severity of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. We analyzed changes in joint space revealed by standing extended view (SEV) and FFV over a mean 4 years, to compare both views on their capacity to measure joint space width accurately at particular time points during follow-up.SEV and FFV images were acquired in patients with knee OA. The 81 patients (157 knees) followed up for ≥24 months were selected as study subjects. Medial joint space widths (MJSW), Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grades, and reductions in MJSW on SEV (ΔSEV) and FFV (ΔFFV) were compared in knees evaluated by SEV and FFV.At both time-points, mean MJSW was significantly lower by FFV than by SEV. Mean MJSW was significantly lower at follow-up than at first examination by both SEV and FFV. At both time-points, the KL grade was higher by FFV than by SEV group. The ΔFFV was significantly greater than the ΔSEV. ΔSEV did not differ significantly among KL grades, but ΔFFV was significantly greater in patients with KL grade II than in patients with other KL grades.FFV is not only useful for evaluating joint space in knees with OA, but also for accurately evaluating the progression of OA. The risk of rapid progression of knee OA may be higher in patients with KL grade II, as determined by FFV. FFV may be superior to SEV in determining appropriate treatment strategies for knee OA.
机译:当评估膝盖的骨关节炎(OA)的严重程度时,固定屈曲视图(FFV)可用于评估关节间隙。我们分析了平均站立时间(SEV)和FFV在平均4年内揭示的关节间隙变化,以便比较两种观点在随访期间的特定时间点准确测量关节间隙宽度的能力。在膝OA患者中。选择81例(157膝)≥24个月的患者作为研究对象。比较了通过SEV和FFV评估的膝盖的内侧关节间隙宽度(MJSW),Kellgren–Lawrence(KL)等级以及SEV(ΔSEV)和FFV(ΔFFV)的MJSW降低。在两个时间点,平均MJSW均显着FFV比SEV低。随访时,SEV和FFV的平均MJSW均明显低于首次检查。在两个时间点,FFV的KL评分均高于SEV组的KL评分。 ΔFFV明显大于ΔSEV。 KL级之间的ΔSEV没有显着差异,但KL级II患者的ΔFFV明显高于其他KL级患者.FFV不仅可用于评估OA膝关节的关节间隙,还可用于准确评估OA膝关节的进展OA。 FFV确定,KL II级患者膝OA快速发展的风险可能更高。在确定适当的膝OA治疗策略时,FFV可能优于SEV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号