首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Use of Twitter by Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Twitter Activity Impact Factor and Alternative Metrics
【2h】

The Use of Twitter by Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Twitter Activity Impact Factor and Alternative Metrics

机译:创伤杂志和整形外科杂志对Twitter的使用:Twitter活动影响因子和替代指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AimSocial media (SoMe) platforms have become leading methods of communication and dissemination of scientific information in the medical community. They allow for immediate discussion and widespread engagement around important topics. It has been hypothesized that the activity on Twitter positively correlates with highly cited articles. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence and activity of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery journals on Twitter, with the hypothesis that impact factor is positively associated with Twitter usage.MethodsThe top 50 Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery journals, ranked by 2016 Impact Factor were analyzed. The Twitter profiles of each journal or affiliated society were identified. Other SoMe platforms used were also recorded. Twitonomy software (Digonomy Pty Ltd, New South Wales, Australia) was used to analyze the Twitter profiles over a one-year period. Twitter Klout Scores were recorded for each journal to approximate the SoMe influence. Altmetric Scores (the total number of mentions via alternative metrics) were also recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out to identify correlations between journal Impact Factors, SoMe activity, Twitter Klout Scores and Altmetric Scores. ResultsTwenty-two journals (44%) had dedicated Twitter profiles. Fourteen journals (28%) were associated with societies that had profiles and 14 journals (28%) had no Twitter presence. The mean Impact Factor overall was 2.16 +/- 0.14 (range, 1.07-5.16). The journals with dedicated Twitter profiles had higher Impact Factors than those without (mean 2.41 vs. 1.61; P=0.005). A greater number of Twitter followers were associated with higher Impact Factors (R2 0.317, P=0.03). Journals with higher Twitter Klout Scores had higher Impact Factors (R2 0.357, P=0.016). Altmetric Score was positively associated with Impact Factor (R2 0.310, P=0.015). Journals with higher numbers of retweets (virtual citations in the Twittersphere) had higher Altmetric Scores (R2 0.463, P=0.015).ConclusionTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery journals with dedicated Twitter profiles have higher Impact Factors than those without. Altmetrics is likely to play a significant role in the literature evaluation going forward along with the traditional metrics. The engagement with Twitter by Trauma and Orthopaedic surgeons should be encouraged.
机译:AimSocial媒体(SoMe)平台已成为医学界传播和传播科学信息的领先方法。他们允许围绕重要主题进行即时讨论和广泛参与。据推测,Twitter上的活动与被高引用的文章成正相关。这项研究的目的是分析创伤因素和整形外科杂志在Twitter上的流行和活动,并假设影响因素与Twitter的使用呈正相关。方法对2016年影响因素排名前50位的创伤和整形外科杂志进行了分析。确定每个期刊或附属协会的Twitter个人资料。还记录了使用的其他SoMe平台。 Twitonomy软件(Digonomy Pty Ltd,澳大利亚新南威尔士州)用于分析一年内的Twitter资料。记录每个期刊的Twitter Klout分数,以近似估算SoMe的影响力。还记录了Altmetric分(通过替代指标的提及总数)。进行统计分析以识别期刊影响因子,SoMe活动,Twitter Klout得分和Altmetric得分之间的相关性。结果22份期刊(44%)拥有专门的Twitter个人资料。 14个期刊(占28%)与具有简介的社会相关,而14个期刊(占28%)没有Twitter的存在。总体平均影响因子为2.16 +/- 0.14(范围为1.07-5.16)。具有专用Twitter个人资料的期刊的影响因子要高于没有Twitter的期刊(平均2.41对1.61; P = 0.005)。更多的Twitter关注者与更高的影响因子相关(R2 0.317,P = 0.03)。 Twitter Klout得分较高的期刊具有较高的影响因子(R2 0.357,P = 0.016)。 Altmetric分数与影响因子(R2 0.310,P = 0.015)正相关。转推次数较多(在Twitter领域中被虚拟引用)的期刊具有更高的Altmetric得分(R2 0.463,P = 0.015)。结论具有专门的Twitter个人资料的创伤杂志和整形外科杂志的影响因子要高于未发布Twitter的期刊。 Altmetrics可能会与传统指标一起在今后的文献评估中发挥重要作用。应当鼓励Trauma和整形外科医生与Twitter进行互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号