首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Community Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Translational Research and Researchers
【2h】

Community Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Translational Research and Researchers

机译:临床和转化研究人员的社区经验和看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Engaging communities in research is increasingly recognized as critical to translation of research into improved health outcomes. Our objective was to understand community stakeholders’ perspectives on researchers, academic institutions, and how community is valued in research. A 45-item survey assessing experiences and perceptions of research (trust, community value, equity, researcher preparedness, indicators of successful engagement) was distributed to 226 community members involved in health research with academic institutions. Of the 109 respondents, 60% were racial/ethnic minorities and 78% were women, representing a range of community organizations, faith-based organizations, and public health agencies. Most (57%) reported current involvement with a CTSA. Only 25% viewed researchers as well prepared to engage communities and few (13%) reported that resources were available and adequate to support community involvement. Most community stakeholders (66%) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40% perceived compensation to be appropriate. Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were more positive among those who perceived their compensation as appropriate (p=0.001).Appropriate compensation and resources to support community involvement in research may improve perceptions of trust and value in academic-community partnerships. Strategies are needed to increase researcher preparedness to engage with communities.
机译:越来越多的社区参与研究对于将研究转化为改善健康状况至关重要。我们的目标是了解社区利益相关者对研究人员,学术机构的看法,以及社区在研究中的价值。一项45项调查评估了研究的经验和看法(信任,社区价值,公平,研究人员的准备情况,成功参与的指标),已分发给参与学术机构健康研究的226位社区成员。在109名受访者中,代表各种社区组织,基于信仰的组织和公共卫生机构的是种族/族裔少数民族,占60%,妇女是78%。大多数(57%)报告说目前参与了CTSA。只有25%的研究人员认为研究人员已经做好与社区互动的充分准备,很少(13%)的研究人员认为有足够的资源来支持社区参与。大多数社区利益相关者(66%)因参与研究而获得了补偿,但只有40%的人认为补偿是适当的。对研究的信任和对研究人员重视社区的看法在认为自己的薪酬适当的人中更为积极(p = 0.001)。适当的薪酬和支持社区参与研究的资源可能会改善对学术-社区伙伴关系的信任和价值观。需要采取策略来增加研究人员与社区互动的准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号