首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Does Individual Gambling Behavior Vary across Gambling Venues with Differing Numbers of Terminals? An Empirical Real-World Study using Player Account Data
【2h】

Does Individual Gambling Behavior Vary across Gambling Venues with Differing Numbers of Terminals? An Empirical Real-World Study using Player Account Data

机译:不同终端数量的赌博场所之间的个人赌博行为会有所不同吗?使用玩家帐户数据进行的实证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research examining gambling behavior via experiments, self-report, and/or observation presents many methodical challenges particularly in relation to objectivity. However, the use of player account-based gambling data provides purely objective data. Based on this real-world data, the primary aim of the present study was to examine gambling behavior in gambling venues with different numbers of gambling terminals (i.e., venues with one terminal; 2–5 terminals; 6–10 terminals; 11–16 terminals). Player account-based gambling data aggregated over a year (2015) amounting to 153,379 observations within 93,034 individual gamblers (males = 74%; mean age = 44.1, SD = 16.4 years) were analyzed. Gambling frequency was highest in venues with 2–5 terminals (54.5%) and lowest in venues with 11–16 terminals (1.6%). Approximately half of the sample (52.5%) gambled in only one venue category, with the majority (81.5%) preferring venues with 2–5 terminals present. Only 0.8% of the sample gambled in all four venue categories. Compared to venues with one terminal, venues with two or more terminals were associated with gamblers placing more bets, and spending more time and money per session. However, gamblers had higher losses (albeit small) in venues with one terminal compared to venues with 2–5 terminals. No differences in net outcome were found between venues with one terminal and those with 6–10 and 11–16 terminals. Overall, the present study demonstrates that in the natural gambling environment, gambling behavior is reinforced in venues with multiple terminals.
机译:通过实验,自我报告和/或观察检查赌博行为的研究提出了许多方法上的挑战,特别是在客观性方面。但是,基于玩家帐户的赌博数据的使用提供了纯粹的客观数据。基于此实际数据,本研究的主要目的是研究在具有不同数量的赌博终端的赌博场所(即,一个终端,2-5个终端,6-10个终端,11-16个场所)中的赌博行为终端)。分析了一年(2015年)中基于玩家帐户的赌博数据,总计93,034名个体赌徒(男性= 74%;平均年龄= 44.1,SD = 16.4岁)内观察到153,379次观察。在拥有2–5个终端的场所中,赌博频率最高(54.5%),而在拥有11–16个终端的场所中,赌博频率最低(1.6%)。大约一半的样本(52.5%)仅在一种场所类别中进行赌博,而大多数(81.5%)则偏爱存在2-5个终端的场所。在所有四个场所类别中,只有0.8%的样本进行了赌博。与具有一个终端的场馆相比,具有两个或多个终端的场馆与押注更多赌注的赌徒相关联,并且每次会话花费更多的时间和金钱。但是,与拥有2-5个航站楼的场馆相比,拥有一个航站楼的场馆的赌徒损失较高(尽管很小)。在拥有一个候机楼的场馆与有6–10和11–16候机楼的场馆之间,没有发现净结果的差异。总体而言,本研究表明,在自然赌博环境中,具有多个终端的场馆会增强赌博行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号