首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Focused Ultrasound Transducer Spatial Peak Intensity Estimation: AComparison of Methods
【2h】

Focused Ultrasound Transducer Spatial Peak Intensity Estimation: AComparison of Methods

机译:聚焦超声换能器空间峰强度估计:A方法比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Characterisation of the spatial peak intensity at the focus of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) transducers is difficult because of the risk of damage to hydrophone sensors at the high focal pressures generated. provided a simple equation for estimating spatial-peak intensity for solid spherical bowl transducers using measured acoustic power and focal beamwidth. This paper demonstrates theoretically and experimentally that this expression is only strictly valid for spherical bowl transducers without a central (imaging) aperture. A hole in the centre of the transducer results in over-estimation of the peak intensity. Improved strategies for determining focal peak intensity from a measurement of total acoustic power are proposed. Four methods are compared: (i) a solid spherical bowl approximation (after ), (ii) a numerical method derived from theory, (iii) a method using measured sidelobe to focal peak pressure, and (iv) a method for measuring the focal power fraction (FPF) experimentally. Spatial-peak intensities were estimated for 8 transducers at three drive powers levels: low (approximately 1W), moderate (~10W) and high (20 - 70W). The calculated intensities were compared with those derived from focal peak pressure measurements made using a calibrated hydrophone. TheFPF measurement method was found to provide focal peak intensity estimates thatagreed most closely (within 15%) with the hydrophone measurements, followed bythe pressure ratio method (within 20%). The numerical method was found toconsistently over-estimate focal peak intensity (+40% on average), however, fortransducers with a central hole it was more accurate than using the solid bowlassumption (+70% overestimation). In conclusion, the ability to make use of anautomated beam plotting system, and a hydrophone with good spatial resolution,greatly facilitates characterisation of the FPF, and consequently gives improvedconfidence in estimating spatial peak intensity from measurement of acousticpower.
机译:高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)换能器聚焦处的空间峰值强度表征很困难,因为在产生的高聚焦压力下损坏水听器传感器的风险。提供了一个简单的方程式,用于使用测得的声功率和聚焦束宽来估算固体球形碗形换能器的空间峰值强度。本文在理论和实验上证明了该表达式仅对没有中心(成像)孔径的球形碗形换能器严格有效。换能器中心的孔会导致峰值强度的高估。提出了一种通过测量总声功率来确定焦点峰值强度的改进策略。比较了四种方法:(i)实心球碗近似(之后),(ii)从理论推导的数值方法,(iii)使用测得的旁瓣到焦峰压力的方法,以及(iv)测量焦距的方法实验功率分数(FPF)。在三种驱动功率级别下,估计了8个传感器的空间峰值强度:低(大约1W),中(大约10W)和高(20-70W)。将计算出的强度与从使用校准水听器进行的峰值峰值压力测量得出的强度进行比较。的发现FPF测量方法可提供聚焦峰强度估计值与水听器的测量最一致(在15%以内),其次压力比法(20%以内)。发现了数值方法持续高估焦点峰值强度(平均+ 40%)带有中心孔的传感器比使用实心碗更准确假设(高估了70%)。总之,利用自动波束绘图系统和具有良好空间分辨率的水听器,极大地简化了FPF的特性,因此可以改善通过声学测量估算空间峰值强度的信心功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号