首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Children and Adults Who Have Experienced Complex Childhood Trauma: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
【2h】

The Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Children and Adults Who Have Experienced Complex Childhood Trauma: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:经历复杂的儿童创伤的儿童和成年人的眼动脱敏和再加工的功效:随机对照试验的系统评价。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Survivors of complex childhood trauma (CT) such as sexual abuse show poorer outcomes compared to single event trauma survivors. A growing number of studies investigate Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but no systematic reviews have focused on EMDR treatment for CT as an intervention for both adults and children. This study therefore systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of EMDR on PTSD symptoms in adults and children exposed to CT.>Methods: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched in October 2017. Randomized controlled trials which recruited adult and children with experience of CT, which compared EMDR to alternative treatments or control conditions, and which measured PTSD symptoms were included. Study methodology quality was evaluated with Platinum Standard scale.>Results: Six eligible RCTs of 251 participants were included in this systematic review. The results indicated that EMDR was associated with reductions in PTSD symptoms, depression and/or anxiety both post-treatment and at follow-up compared with all other alternative therapies (cognitive behavior therapy, individual/group therapy and fluoxetine) and control treatment (pill placebo, active listening, EMDR delayed treatment, and treatment as usual). However, studies suffered from significant heterogeneity in study populations, length of EMDR treatment, length of follow-up, comparison groups, and outcome measures. One study had a high risk of bias.>Discussion: This systematic review suggests that there is growing evidence to support the clinical efficacy of EMDR in treating CT in both children and adults. However, conclusions are limited by the small number of heterogenous trials. Further RCTs with standardized methodologies, as well as studies addressing real world challenges in treating CT are required.
机译:>背景:复杂的儿童期性创伤(CT)的幸存者(如性虐待)与单事件创伤的幸存者相比,结局较差。越来越多的研究调查了针对眼外伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)治疗,但是没有系统的评论集中于针对成人和儿童的CT EMDR治疗。因此,本研究系统地回顾了所有评估EMDR对暴露于CT的成年人和儿童PTSD症状影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。>方法:检索了PubMed,Web of Science和PsycINFO等数据库2017年10月。随机对照试验招募了具有CT经验的成人和儿童,将EMDR与替代治疗或对照条件进行了比较,并测量了PTSD症状。研究方法的质量用白金标准量表进行评估。>结果:本系统评价纳入了251名参与者的6项合格RCT。结果表明,与所有其他替代疗法(认知行为疗法,个体/小组疗法和氟西汀)和对照疗法(药丸)相比,EMDR与治疗后和随访时PTSD症状,抑郁症和/或焦虑症的缓解相关安慰剂,积极倾听,EMDR延迟治疗以及照常治疗)。但是,研究在研究人群,EMDR治疗时间,随访时间,对照组和结果指标方面存在明显的异质性。一项研究存在偏见的高风险。>讨论:该系统评价表明,越来越多的证据支持EMDR在儿童和成人中治疗CT的临床疗效。但是,结论受到少数异源试验的限制。需要采用标准化方法的进一步RCT,以及应对现实世界中治疗CT挑战的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号