首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology Evolution
【2h】

Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology Evolution

机译:在野生哺乳动物中比较微生物组采样方法:粪便和肠道样本记录了宿主生态进化的不同信号

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The gut microbiome is a community of host-associated symbiotic microbes that fulfills multiple key roles in host metabolism, immune function, and tissue development. Given the ability of the microbiome to impact host fitness, there is increasing interest in studying the microbiome of wild animals to better understand these communities in the context of host ecology and evolution. Human microbiome research protocols are well established, but wildlife microbiome research is still a developing field. Currently, there is no standardized set of best practices guiding the collection of microbiome samples from wildlife. Gut microflora are typically sampled either by fecal collection, rectal swabbing, or by destructively sampling the intestinal contents of the host animal. Studies rarely include more than one sampling technique and no comparison of these methods currently exists for a wild mammal. Although some studies have hypothesized that the fecal microbiome is a nested subset of the intestinal microbiome, this hypothesis has not been formally tested. To address these issues, we examined guano (feces) and distal intestinal mucosa from 19 species of free-ranging bats from Lamanai, Belize, using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to compare microbial communities across sample types. We found that the diversity and composition of intestine and guano samples differed substantially. In addition, we conclude that signatures of host evolution are retained by studying gut microbiomes based on mucosal tissue samples, but not fecal samples. Conversely, fecal samples retained more signal of host diet than intestinal samples. These results suggest that fecal and intestinal sampling methods are not interchangeable, and that these two microbiotas record different information about the host from which they are isolated.
机译:肠道微生物组是与宿主相关的共生微生物的群落,在宿主代谢,免疫功能和组织发育中发挥多种关键作用。考虑到微生物组影响寄主健康的能力,人们越来越关注研究野生动物的微生物组,以便在寄主生态和进化的背景下更好地了解这些群落。人类微生物组研究方案已经建立,但是野生生物微生物组研究仍处于发展中。当前,尚没有一套标准的最佳做法来指导从野生生物中收集微生物组样本。肠道菌群通常通过粪便收集,直肠拭子或破坏性取样宿主动物的肠内容物进行取样。研究很少包括一种以上的采样技术,目前没有将这些方法与野生哺乳动物进行比较。尽管一些研究假设粪便微生物组是肠道微生物组的嵌套子集,但这一假设尚未经过正式检验。为解决这些问题,我们使用16S rRNA扩增子测序技术比较了跨样本类型的微生物群落,研究了来自伯利兹Lamanai的19种自由放养蝙蝠的鸟粪(粪便)和远端肠粘膜。我们发现肠和鸟粪样品的多样性和组成有很大的不同。此外,我们得出结论,通过研究基于粘膜组织样本而非粪便样本的肠道微生物群,可以保留宿主进化的特征。相反,粪便样品比肠道样品保留更多的宿主饮食信号。这些结果表明,粪便和肠道采样方法是不可互换的,并且这两个微生物群记录了与它们分离的宿主有关的不同信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号