首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Are the Current Thresholds Indicators and Time Window for Cold Warning Effective Enough to Protect Cardiovascular Health?
【2h】

Are the Current Thresholds Indicators and Time Window for Cold Warning Effective Enough to Protect Cardiovascular Health?

机译:当前的冷警告阈值指标和时间窗口是否足以保护心血管健康?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

More extreme cold weather and larger weather variations have raised concerns regarding their effects on public health. Although prior studies assessed the effects of cold air temperature on health, especially mortality, limited studies evaluated wind chill temperatures on morbidity, and health effects under the current cold warning threshold. This study identified the thresholds, lag periods, and best indicators of extreme cold on cardiovascular disease (CVD) by comparing effects of wind chill temperatures and cold air temperatures on CVD emergency department (ED) visits in winter and winter transition months. Information was collected on 662,625 CVD ED visits from statewide hospital discharge dataset in New York State. Meteorological factors, including air temperature, wind speed, and barometric pressure were collected from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. A case-crossover approach was used to assess the extreme cold-CVD relationship in winter (December-February) and transition months (November and March) after controlling for PM2.5. Conditional logistic regression models were employed to analyze the association between cold weather factors and CVD ED visits. We observed CVD effects occurred when wind chill temperatures were as high as −3.8°C (25°F), warmer than current wind chill warning standard (≤−28.8°C or ≤−20°F). Wind chill temperature was a more sensitive indicator of CVD ED visits during winter with temperatures ≤−3.8°C (25°F) with delay effect (lag 6); however, air temperature was better during transition months for temperatures ≤7.2°C (45°F) at earlier lag days (1–3). Among all CVD subtypes, hypertension ED visit had the strongest negative association with both wind chill temperature and air temperature. This study recommends modifying the current cold warning temperature threshold given larger proportions of CVD cases are occurring at considerably higher temperatures than the current criteria. We also recommend issuing cold warnings in winter transitional months.
机译:更加极端的寒冷天气和更大的天气变化引起了人们对其对公共健康的影响的担忧。尽管先前的研究评估了冷空气温度对健康(尤其是死亡率)的影响,但有限的研究评估了风寒温度对发病率以及在当前寒冷警告阈值下的健康影响。这项研究通过比较冬季和冬季过渡月份的风寒温度和冷空气温度对CVD急诊科(ED)的访视影响,确定了极端寒冷对心血管疾病(CVD)的阈值,滞后时间和最佳指标。从纽约州全州医院出院数据集中收集了662,625例CVD ED访问的信息。气象因素包括气温,风速和大气压力是从美国国家海洋和大气管理局收集的。在控制PM2.5之后,采用病例交叉法评估了冬季(12月至2月)和过渡月份(11月和3月)的极端冷CVD关系。使用条件对数回归模型分析寒冷天气因素与CVD ED访视之间的关联。我们观察到,当风寒温度高达-3.8°C(25°F),比当前的风寒预警标准(≤-28.8°C或≤-20°F)高时,就会发生CVD效应。风寒温度是冬季CVD ED访视的更敏感指标,温度≤−3.8°C(25°F)并有延迟效果(延迟6);但是,在过渡月份,气温在滞后几天(1-3)≤7.2°C(45°F)时较好。在所有CVD亚型中,高血压ED就诊与风寒温度和气温均具有最强的负相关性。这项研究建议修改当前的冷警告温度阈值,因为更多的CVD案例发生在比当前标准高得多的温度下。我们还建议在冬季过渡月份发布冷警告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号