首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations: 1. Data methods and comparisons
【2h】

Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations: 1. Data methods and comparisons

机译:从基于卫星的远紫外线和基于地面的电离探空仪观测获得的极光电离层E区域参数:1.数据方法和比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A large number (~1000) of coincident auroral far ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared. This is the largest study to date of coincident satellite-based FUV and ground-based observations of the auroral E region. FUV radiance values from the NASA Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) and the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F16 and F18 Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) are included in the study. A method is described for deriving auroral ionospheric E region maximum electron density (NmE) and height of maximum electron density (hmE) from N2 Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) radiances given in two channels using lookup tables generated with the Boltzmann 3-Constituent (B3C) auroral particle transport and optical emission model. Our rules for scaling (i.e., extracting ionospheric parameters from) ionograms to obtain auroral NmE and hmE are also described. Statistical and visual comparison methods establish statistical consistency and agreement between the two methods for observing auroral NmE, but not auroral hmE. It is expected that auroral non-uniformity will cause the two NmE methods to give inconsistent results, but we have not attempted to quantify this effect in terms of more basic principles, and our results show that the two types of NmE observations are well correlated and statistically symmetrical, meaning that there is no overall bias and no scale-dependent bias.
机译:比较了大量(〜1000)重合的极光远紫外线(FUV)和地面离子探空仪的观测结果。这是迄今为止基于卫星的FUV和极光E地区的地面观测同时进行的最大规模的研究。研究中包括来自NASA热层,电离层,中层能量与动力学(TIMED)全球紫外成像仪(GUVI)和国防气象卫星计划(DMSP)F16和F18特殊传感器紫外光谱成像仪(SSUSI)的FUV辐射值。描述了一种方法,该方法使用两个玻尔兹曼3成分生成的查找表,从两个通道中给出的N2莱曼-伯奇-霍普菲尔德(LBH)辐射中得出极光电离层E区最大电子密度(NmE)和最大电子密度(hmE)的高度(B3C)极光粒子传输和光发射模型。还描述了我们缩放电离图(即从电离层中提取电离层参数)以获得极光NmE和hmE的规则。统计和视觉比较方法建立了两种观测极光NmE而不是极光hmE的统计一致性和一致性。预期极光的不均匀性将导致两种NmE方法给出不一致的结果,但是我们没有尝试根据更基本的原理来量化这种效果,并且我们的结果表明两种类型的NmE观测值具有很好的相关性,并且统计上对称,这意味着不存在总体偏差,也不存在与比例相关的偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号