首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Table tennis playing styles require specific energy systems demands
【2h】

Table tennis playing styles require specific energy systems demands

机译:乒乓球打法需要特定的能量系统要求

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in energy system contributions and temporal variables between offensive and all-round playing styles. Fifteen male table tennis players (Offensive players: N = 7; All-round players: N = 8) participated in the study. Matches were monitored by a portable gas analyzer and the blood lactate responses was also measured. The contributions of the oxidative (WOXID), phosphagen (WPCr), and glycolytic (W[La]) energy systems were assumed as the oxygen consumption measured during the matches above of baseline value, the fast component of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOCFAST) measured after the matches, and the net of blood lactate concentration (Δ[La]), respectively. Energy systems contributions were not significantly different between the offensive and all-round playing styles (WOXID: 96.1±2.0 and 97.0±0.6%, P = 0.86; WPCr: 2.7±1.7 and 2.0±0.6%, P = 0.13; W[La]: 1.2±0.5 and 1.0±0.7%, P = 0.95; respectively), however, magnitude-based analysis of WPCr presented Likely higher contribution for offensive compared to all-round players. Regarding temporal variables, only rate of shots presented higher values for offensive when compared to all-round players (P = 0.03), while the magnitude-based analysis presented Very likely lower, Likely lower and Likely higher outcomes of rate of shots, WPCr and maximal oxygen consumption, respectively, for all-round players. Strong negative correlation was verified for offensive players between number of shots and WPCr (r = -0.86, P = 0.01), while all-round players showed strong correlations between rally duration, WOXID (r = 0.76, P = 0.03) and maximal oxygen consumption (r = 0.81, P = 0.03). Therefore, despite no differences in energy system contributions for offensive and all-round players, different playing styles seems to requires specific energy systems demands.
机译:本研究的目的是研究进攻性和全能型之间的能量系统贡献和时间变量的差异。十五名男性乒乓球运动员(进攻性运动员:N = 7;全能运动员:N = 8)参加了研究。用便携式气体分析仪监测比赛情况,并测量血乳酸反应。氧化(WOXID),磷原(WPCr)和糖酵解(WLa)能量系统的贡献被假定为在基线值以上匹配过程中测得的耗氧量,即运动后过量耗氧量的快速组成部分(比赛后测得的EPOCFAST和血乳酸浓度的净值(ΔLa)。进攻和全能比赛方式对能量系统的贡献没有显着差异(WOXID:96.1±2.0和97.0±0.6%,P = 0.86; WPCr:2.7±1.7和2.0±0.6%,P = 0.13; W [La ]:分别为1.2±0.5%和1.0±0.7%,P = 0.95),但是,基于WPCr的基于幅度的分析显示,与全能运动员相比,WPCr对进攻的贡献更大。关于时间变量,与全能运动员相比,只有投篮命中率才具有较高的进攻价值(P = 0.03),而基于量级的分析表明,投篮命中率,WPCr和全方位运动员的最大氧气消耗量。进攻球员的枪击次数与WPCr之间存在强烈的负相关性(r = -0.86,P = 0.01),而全方位的球员则显示出反弹时间,WOXID(r = 0.76,P = 0.03)与最大氧气之间的强烈相关性消耗(r = 0.81,P = 0.03)。因此,尽管进攻型和全能型球员的能量系统贡献没有差异,但不同的比赛方式似乎仍需要特定的能量系统需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号