首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Supervised but Not Home-Based Isometric Training Improves Brachial and Central Blood Pressure in Medicated Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Supervised but Not Home-Based Isometric Training Improves Brachial and Central Blood Pressure in Medicated Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:有监督的但非家庭式的等轴测训练可改善药物性高血压患者的肱和中枢血压:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Meta-analyses have shown that supervised isometric handgrip training reduces blood pressure in hypertensives. However, the mechanism(s) underlying these effects in medicated hypertensive patients, as well as the effects from home-based exercise training, is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of supervised and home-based isometric handgrip training on cardiovascular parameters in medicated hypertensives. In this randomized controlled trial, 72 hypertensive individuals (38–79 years old, 70% female) were randomly assigned to three groups: home-based, supervised isometric handgrip training or control groups. Home-based and supervised isometric handgrip training was completed thrice weekly (4 × 2 min at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, with 1-min rest between bouts, alternating the hands). Before and after 12 weeks brachial, central and ambulatory blood pressures (BP), arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, vascular function, oxidative stress and inflammation markers were obtained. No significant (p > 0.05) effect was observed for ambulatory BP, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, vascular function and oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in all three groups. Brachial BP decreased in the supervised group (Systolic: 132 ± 4 vs. 120 ± 3 mmHg; Diastolic: 71 ± 2 vs. 66 ± 2 mmHg, p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the home-based (Systolic: 130 ± 4 vs. 126 ± 3 mmHg; diastolic: 73 ± 3 vs. 71 ± 3 mmHg) and control groups (p > 0.05). Supervised handgrip exercise also reduced central BP systolic (120 ± 5 vs. 109 ± 5 mmHg), diastolic (73 ± 2 vs. 67 ± 2 mmHg); and mean BP (93 ± 3 vs. 84 ± 3 mmHg), whereas no significant effects were found in the home-based (Systolic: 119 ± 4 vs. 115 ± 3 mmHg; Diastolic: 74 ± 3 vs. 71 ± 3 mmHg) and control groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, supervised, but not home-based, isometric training lowered brachial and central BP in hypertensives.
机译:荟萃分析表明,有监督的等距手柄训练可降低高血压患者的血压。但是,对药物性高血压患者这些作用的潜在机制以及家庭锻炼训练的作用尚不确定。这项研究的目的是比较有监督的和基于家庭的等距手柄训练对药物性高血压患者心血管参数的影响。在这项随机对照试验中,将72名高血压患者(38-79岁,女性占70%)随机分为三组:家庭式,监督式等距手柄训练或对照组。每周进行三次为基础的家庭式有监督的等距握力训练(4×2分钟,最大自愿收缩的30%,两次练习之间休息1分钟,交替动手)。在12周之前和之后获得肱,中央和门诊血压(BP),动脉僵硬度,心率变异性,血管功能,氧化应激和炎症标志物。在所有三组中,动态血压,动脉僵硬度,心率变异性,血管功能,氧化应激和炎性标志物均未观察到显着(p> 0.05)影响。监督组的肱动脉血压降低(收缩压:132±4 vs. 120±3 mmHg;舒张压:71±2 vs. 66±2 mmHg,p <0.05),而在家庭患者(收缩压)中没有观察到显着差异:130±4 vs. 126±3 mmHg;舒张压:73±3 vs. 71±3 mmHg)和对照组(p> 0.05)。有监督的手握锻炼还可降低中央血压收缩压(120±5 vs. 109±5 mmHg),舒张压(73±2 vs. 67±2 mmHg);和平均血压(93±3 vs. 84±3 mmHg),而在家中未发现明显的影响(收缩压:119±4 vs. 115±3 mmHg;舒张压:74±3 vs. 71±3 mmHg )和对照组(p> 0.05)。总之,在有指导的,但不是基于家庭的等距训练下,高血压患者的肱动脉和中枢血压降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号