首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
【2h】

Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings

机译:评估在紧急情况下遏制和安全处理人类排泄物的推荐方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based approaches (10%, 20% and 30% Ca(OH)2). The experiments followed recent recommendations for Ebola Treatment Centres. Three excreta matrices containing either raw municipal wastewater, or raw municipal wastewater plus 10% or 20% (w/v) added faecal sludge, were treated in 14 litre buckets at a ratio of 1:10 (chlorine solutions or lime suspensions: excreta matrix). The effects of mixing versus non-mixing and increasing contact time (10 and 30 mins) were also investigated. Bacterial (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral (somatic coliphages (SOMPH), F+specific phages (F+PH) and Bacteroides fragilis phages (GB-124PH)) indicators were used to determine the efficacy of each approach. Lime-based approaches provided greater treatment efficacy than chlorine-based approaches, with lime (30% w/v) demonstrating the greatest efficacy (log reductions values, FC = 4.75, IE = 4.16, SOMPH = 2.85, F+PH = 5.13 and GB124PH = 5.41). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between any of the chlorine-based approaches, and the highest log reduction values were: FC = 2.90, IE = 2.36, SOMPH = 3.01, F+PH = 2.36 and GB124PH = 0.74. No statistical difference was observed with respect to contact time for any of the approaches, and no statistical differences were observed with respect to mixing for the chlorine-based approaches. However, statistically significant increases in the efficacy of some lime-based approaches were observed following mixing. These findings provide evidence and practical advice to inform safe handling and containment of excreta and ensure more effective health protection in future emergency settings.
机译:埃博拉和霍乱治疗中心(ETC和CTC)产生大量排泄物,可以进一步在患者和卫生工作者之间传播疾病。因此,需要在这样的环境中安全处理,控制和去除排泄物的方法,以使疾病继续传播的可能性最小。这项研究比较了三种基于氯的方法(0.5%的HTH,NaDCC和NaOCl(家用漂白剂))和三种基于石灰的方法(10%,20%和30%的Ca(OH)2)的性能和适用性。实验遵循了最近针对埃博拉治疗中心的建议。在14升的水桶中以1:10的比例处理三种排泄物基质,这些排泄物基质包含原始市政废水或原始市政废水加10%或20%(w / v)的粪便污泥(氯溶液或石灰悬浮液:排泄物基质) )。还研究了混合与非混合以及增加的接触时间(10和30分钟)的影响。细菌(粪大肠菌群(FC)和肠道肠球菌(IE))和病毒(体性噬菌体(SOMPH),F + 特异性噬菌体(F + PH)和脆弱拟杆菌杆菌噬菌体(GB-124PH))指标被用来确定每种方法的功效。基于石灰的方法比基于氯的方法提供更好的治疗功效,其中石灰(30%w / v)显示出最大的功效(对数减少值,FC = 4.75,IE = 4.16,SOMPH = 2.85,F + PH = 5.13和GB124PH = 5.41)。在任何基于氯的方法之间,疗效均无统计学差异,最高的对数减少值为:FC = 2.90,IE = 2.36,SOMPH = 3.01,F + PH = 2.36和GB124PH = 0.74。对于任何一种方法,在接触时间上均未观察到统计学差异,对于基于氯的方法,在混合时也未观察到统计学差异。然而,在混合后,观察到一些基于石灰的方法的功效在统计学上显着增加。这些发现提供了证据和实用建议,可为排泄物的安全处理和控制提供信息,并确保在未来的紧急情况下更有效地保护健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号