首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >NIMG-65. VOLUMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF PERITUMORAL EDEMA: EXCELLENT TOOL FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CEREBRAL GLIOMAS AND SOLITARY METASTASES
【2h】

NIMG-65. VOLUMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF PERITUMORAL EDEMA: EXCELLENT TOOL FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CEREBRAL GLIOMAS AND SOLITARY METASTASES

机译:NIMG-65。牙周水肿的体积评估:脑胶质瘤和孤立性转移的鉴别诊断的优秀工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

INTRODUCTIONDifferentiating cerebral gliomas from metastatic brain tumors is essential since their management and prognosis is widely different. However it is still challenging to differentiate them without pathologic confirm. In this study, we evaluated the value of tumor volume and peritumoral edema as a tool for differentiating cerebral gliomas and solitary metastases. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed conventional MR images of 91 patients with supratentorial solitary intra-axial tumor which were pathologically confirmed by surgical procedures. Patients were classified as cerebral glioma (n=57) and metastatic tumor group (n=34). Glioma group was also subdivided as glioblastoma multiform (GBM) and non-GBM subgroups. Tumor volume, peritumoral edema volume and edema index (peritumoral edema volume/tumor volume) were analyzed by using a semi-automated 3D slicer, and compared between groups. RESULT: Cerebral glioma group showed significantly small edema volume (median 48.90ml, interquartile range[IQR] 62.12 versus 94.02ml, IQR 81.85; p<0.001) and edema index (2.01, IQR 3.15 versus 5.35, IQR 7.99; p<0.001) compared to metastatic tumor group. GBM subgroup also presented large tumor volume (median 31.45ml, IQR 40.29 versus 17.37ml, IQR 21.80; p=0.007), small edema volume (52.43ml, IQR 55.06; p=0.004) and edema index (2.03, IQR 2.16; p<0.001) than metastatic tumor group. There were no difference between non-GBM and GBM subgroups.
机译:简介区分脑胶质瘤与转移性脑瘤是必不可少的,因为它们的治疗和预后差异很大。然而,在没有病理学证实的情况下区分它们仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们评估了肿瘤体积和肿瘤周围水肿作为区分脑胶质瘤和孤立性转移的工具的价值。方法:我们回顾性回顾了91例上睑上孤立性轴内肿瘤的常规MR图像,这些图像经手术方法病理证实。患者分为脑胶质瘤(n = 57)和转移性肿瘤组(n = 34)。胶质瘤组也分为胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)和非GBM亚组。使用半自动3D切片机分析肿瘤体积,肿瘤周围水肿体积和水肿指数(周围水肿体积/肿瘤体积),并在各组之间进行比较。结果:脑胶质瘤组显示明显较小的水肿体积(中位48.90ml,四分位间距[IQR] 62.12对94.02ml,IQR 81.85; p <0.001)和水肿指数(2.01,IQR 3.15对5.35,IQR 7.99; p <0.001)与转移性肿瘤组相比。 GBM亚组还表现出较大的肿瘤体积(中位31.45ml,IQR 40.29对17.37ml,IQR 21.80; p = 0.007),小水肿体积(52.43ml,IQR 55.06; p = 0.004)和水肿指数(2.03,IQR 2.16; p <0.001)高于转移性肿瘤组。非GBM和GBM子组之间没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号