首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >INCLUDING OLDER PEOPLE IN PUBLIC POLICY: STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF 14 YEARS OF BELGIAN AGEING STUDIES
【2h】

INCLUDING OLDER PEOPLE IN PUBLIC POLICY: STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF 14 YEARS OF BELGIAN AGEING STUDIES

机译:公共政策中包括老年人-比利时老龄化研究14年的优势和局限性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Belgian Ageing Studies was developed as a participatory project involving older people to assess the age-friendliness of their community and to develop a local policy plan based on the findings of the assessment. This contribution will look back at 14 years of the Belgian Ageing Studies, and reflect on the realizations, strengths and limitations of this research-policy program. An online-survey was sent out to all communities who participated throughout the years. Results will highlight both the strengths (e.g. research for and by older people; broadened view of policy domains important for older people, establishment of a sustainable peer-research program rather than a one-time project) and limitations (e.g. difficulties in translating research results into policy action plans, difficulties in reaching migrant groups) from the research project. The paper concludes by discussing key recommendations for Belgian Ageing Studies 2.0 in order to tackle exclusion of older people in public policy.
机译:比利时老龄化研究是一个参与性项目,涉及老年人,以评估他们社区的年龄友好程度,并根据评估结果制定当地政策计划。这项贡献将回顾比利时老龄化研究的14年,并反思该研究政策计划的实现,优势和局限性。在线调查已发送给多年来参与的所有社区。结果将突出优势(例如针对老年人和针对老年人的研究;扩大对老年人重要的政策领域的观点;建立可持续的同伴研究计划而不是一次性项目)和局限性(例如难以翻译研究结果)研究计划中的政策行动计划,接触移民群体的困难)。本文最后讨论了比利时老龄化研究2.0的关键建议,以解决将老年人排除在公共政策之外的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号