首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >LONELINESS IN LATER LIFE: A SOCIAL PROBLEM OF OLD AGE A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE OR MORAL PANIC?
【2h】

LONELINESS IN LATER LIFE: A SOCIAL PROBLEM OF OLD AGE A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE OR MORAL PANIC?

机译:更高生活中的孤独感:老年的社会问题公共卫生问题或道德恐慌?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The portrayal of loneliness in in the UK has changed over the last decade. The established representation of loneliness was as a social problem of old age. The existence of loneliness among older people has been used by politicians to castigate their citizens for a lack of ‘care’ for older people, and which has generated an intense preoccupation in the media and age-related charities. Since 2010 loneliness (in later life) has been redefined as a public health problem and presenting as causing a range of adverse health consequences for older people. The media has now framed the loneliness ‘epidemic’ as potentially ‘crippling’ the health service given excessive use due to loneliness. Such is the perceived magnitude of the concern over loneliness that in early 2018 the UK created a Minister for Loneliness. In this symposium we adopt a critical and empirically focused approach to the evidence underpinning the debate about loneliness in later life in contemporary society. Victor will examine the empirical evidence that loneliness ‘causes’ excess service use whilst Smith will evaluate evidence linking loneliness and inflammation. Valtorta will critically review the epidemiological evidence linking loneliness to morbidity and mortality, and consider how this evidence is being used to underpin intervention strategies in the UK. Sullivan will provide an in-depth exploration of loneliness representations in the media and disentangle the public narrative whilst Nelson-Becker will explore disenfranchised loneliness, the loneliness emergent from loss, trauma, and dying narratives that friends and family often cannot hear, accept, or acknowledge.
机译:在过去的十年中,英国对孤独感的描述发生了变化。确立的孤独感代表是老年的社会问题。政客们利用老年人中的孤独感来谴责公民,因为他们缺乏对老年人的“照料”,这引起了媒体和与年龄有关的慈善机构的强烈关注。自2010年以来,孤独感(在晚年生活中)已被重新定义为公共健康问题,并呈现给老年人造成一系列不利的健康后果。媒体现在将孤独感“流行”归结为潜在地“削弱”卫生服务,因为孤独感导致使用过多。人们对孤独感的担忧程度如此之大,英国于2018年初成立了孤独大臣。在本次研讨会中,我们采用批判性和以经验为重点的方法,以证据为基础对当代社会晚年生活的孤独感进行辩论。 Victor将研究经验证据,证明孤独感“导致”过度使用服务,而Smith则将评估联系孤独感和炎症的证据。 Valtorta将批判性地审查将孤独与发病率和死亡率联系起来的流行病学证据,并考虑在英国如何利用这些证据来支持干预策略。沙利文将深入探讨媒体中的孤独感,并解开公共叙事,而纳尔逊-贝克尔将探索被剥夺公民权的孤独感,这种孤独感是由于失去,遭受创伤和垂死的叙事而浮现出来的,而亲朋好友通常无法听到,接受或接受确认。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    C Victor;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(2),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 838–839
  • 总页数 2
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号