首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >CBI-20: Psychometric Properties for the Coping Behaviors Inventory for Alcohol Abuse in Brazil
【2h】

CBI-20: Psychometric Properties for the Coping Behaviors Inventory for Alcohol Abuse in Brazil

机译:CBI-20:巴西酒精滥用应对行为量表的心理计量学特性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For any professional, it is of crucial importance to know not only how coping styles and strategies are present in an individual, but to know about its role to the treatment of alcohol abuse. Moreover, new approaches have emerged in this area in terms of relapse prevention and the counseling by phone can be an alternative. The aim of this study is to examine the factor structure of the Coping Behaviors Inventory (CBI) and to test its invariance across groups face-to-face and phone counseling in Brazil. For this purpose, two studies were carried out: study I, the factor structure was revisited in terms of exploratory factor analysis. Study II, face-to-face and phone counseling were examined through confirmatory factor analysis and multigroup analysis. The results confirmed the 4-factor solution with a revised model for the removal of 16 items. Thus presented, a reduced version with better indexes than the previous versions developed over the last 30 years that was ones reformulated from 60 items. The Internal consistency for study I presented α = 0.90 and homogeneity was between 0.17 and 0.5). In addition the KMO = 0.9 = 0.932, X(df=630)2 = 6091.94, p < 0.0 < 0.001. In study II, cronbach's alpha = 0.91 and homogeneity 0.23–0.61 (telemedicine treatment) and α = 0.90 0.17 to 0.63 (face-to-face treatment). In the CFA, the examination of the current version has better fit than the that the traditional model. Moreover, the new version showed convergent validity with the IDHEA questionnaire. In the multigroup analysis no significant changes between groups to a metric level. Finally, the Brazilian version of inventory showed no differences between the phone counseling and face-to-face participants in a metric level after a multigroup analysis.
机译:对于任何专业人士而言,至关重要的是不仅要了解个人的应对方式和策略,而且要了解其在戒酒中的作用。此外,在预防复发方面,该领域出现了新的方法,电话咨询可以替代。这项研究的目的是检查应对行为量表(CBI)的因素结构,并测试其在巴西面对面和电话咨询中的不变性。为此目的,进行了两项研究:研究一,从探索性因素分析的角度重新考虑了因素结构。研究II,通过验证性因素分析和多组分析检查了面对面和电话咨询。结果证实了采用修正模型的4因子解决方案,该模型可删除16个项目。这样就提供了一个简化的版本,其索引比过去30年来开发的先前版本更好,索引是从60项重新制定的。研究I的内部一致性表示α= 0.90,同质性在0.17和0.5之间。另外,KMO = 0.9 = 0.932,<数学xmlns:mml =“ http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML” id =“ M1”溢出=“ scroll”> < mtext> X df = < mn> 630 2 = 6091.94,p <0.0 <0.001。在研究II中,克伦巴赫(Cronbach's)的α= 0.91,同质性0.23–0.61(远程医疗),α= 0.90,0.17至0.63(面对面治疗)。在CFA中,当前版本的检查比传统模型更适合。此外,新版本显示了与IDHEA问卷的收敛性。在多组分析中,组之间到度量标准级别没有显着变化。最后,巴西版本的清单显示,经过多组分析后,电话咨询和面对面参与者在度量标准水平上没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号