首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The effectiveness of clove oil and two different cautery disbudding methods on preventing horn growth in dairy goat kids
【2h】

The effectiveness of clove oil and two different cautery disbudding methods on preventing horn growth in dairy goat kids

机译:丁香油和两种不同的烧灼方法预防奶山羊儿童角生长的功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effectiveness of clove oil and cautery disbudding on horn growth was evaluated in goat kids. The study used 243 Saanen doe kids (4±1 days old; mean±SD) on two goat farms that were disbudded with either (i) clove oil injection (CLOVE), (ii) a cautery iron and bud removed (BUDOFF), or (iii) a cautery iron with bud left intact (BUDON). Each kid received a different treatment per bud, which were balanced between buds (left/right) and randomly allocated. A trained observer monitored bud growth following treatment for 3 months recording either: N: no growth, H: normal horn, S: abnormal horn (scur), or SC: soft, fibrous lump (scorn). After the final observation, buds were assessed for the probability of detecting (i) success (no growth), (ii) scurs, (iii) horns or (iv) scorns [with 95% CI]. The probability of success for BUDOFF (0.77 [0.63, 0.87]) was higher than for BUDON (0.20 [0.11, 0.34]) and CLOVE (0.09 [0.04, 0.18]; P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, the probability of success for BUDON was higher than for CLOVE (P ≤ 0.05). The probability of scurs was higher for CLOVE (0.72 [0.63, 0.80]) than BUDOFF (0.25 [0.17, 0.34]) and BUDON (0.30 [0.21, 0.39]; P ≤ 0.05). There was no difference in the probability of scurs for BUDOFF and BUDON (P > 0.05). The probability of horns was higher for CLOVE (0.21 [0.15, 0.29]) than BUDON (0.02 [0.01, 0.06]; P ≤ 0.05); horns were not observed for BUDOFF. The probability of scorns for BUDON, the only treatment that led to scorns, was 0.41 (0.25, 0.60). These results suggest that BUDOFF was more effective at preventing growth than CLOVE and BUDON and appears the most effective method, of the methods tested, for disbudding kids. Future research should explore other alternatives to cautery disbudding that may be both efficacious and cause less pain.
机译:在山羊儿童中评估了丁香油和烧灼剂对角生长的有效性。该研究使用了两个山羊场上的243名Saanen doe孩子(4±1天大;平均值±SD),这些山羊场的预算不包括(i)丁香油注入(CLOVE),(ii)烙铁和除芽(BUDOFF),或(iii)完好无损的烙铁(BUDON)。每个孩子每个芽接受不同的处理,这些处理在芽之间(左/右)平衡并随机分配。训练有素的观察员治疗3个月后监测芽的生长,记录下:N:无生长; H:正常的角; S:异常的角(发臭); SC:柔软的纤维状块(坏)。最终观察后,评估芽的概率,以发现(i)成功(无生长),(ii)发霉,(iii)角或(iv)[具有95%CI]的轻蔑。 BUDOFF(0.77 [0.63,0.87])成功的概率高于BUDON(0.20 [0.11,0.34])和CLOVE(0.09 [0.04,0.18]; P≤0.05)。此外,BUDON成功的可能性高于CLOVE(P≤0.05)。 CLOVE(0.72 [0.63,0.80])发生毛发的可能性高于BUDOFF(0.25 [0.17,0.34])和BUDON(0.30 [0.21,0.39]; P≤0.05)。 BUDOFF和BUDON发生发臭的可能性没有差异(P> 0.05)。 CLOVE(0.21 [0.15,0.29])的牛角概率高于BUDON(0.02 [0.01,0.06]; P≤0.05);没有观察到喇叭角的BUDOFF。唯一引起,视的治疗BUDON的视概率为0.41(0.25,0.60)。这些结果表明,BUDOFF在预防生长方面比CLOVE和BUDON更有效,并且在测试的方法中似乎是最有效的用于驱散孩子的方法。未来的研究应探索除烧灼外的其他替代方法,这些替代方法既有效又减轻疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号